close

Вход

Забыли?

вход по аккаунту

?

Yulia Final Project Rubric

код для вставкиСкачать
ATDOP at UO
В©2012 AEI, University of Oregon
1
11/0
7/2012
В Final Project Rubric
Yulia
Word Document
5 points
3 points 2 points
1 point
Audience
, t
imeline
, location, equipment
Audience is clearly described and appropriate for workshop goals and objectives.
Timeline is clear, appropriate, & includes locations and equipment needed
.
Very good
Audience is mostly clearly described and may be appropriate for workshop goals and objectives.
Timeline is mostly clear, appropriate; may be missing either Audience is somewhat clearly described and may n
ot be appropriate for workshop goals and objectives.
Timeline is somewhat clear,
appropriate: is missing either
locations or equipment needed.
Audience is not clearly described and is not appropriate for workshop goals and objectives.
Timeline not clear, a
ppropriate; may be missing locations and equipment needed.
5 points
3 points 2 points
1 point
Goals and objectives
Goals are
clear, appropriate, & general. Objectives are specific, observable, and measurable.
Very good
Goals are
mostly clear, appropriate, & general with few problems. Objectives are mostly specific, observable, and measurable with few problems.
Goals are
not clear, appropriate, & general and have problems. Objectives are not specific, observable, and measurable and have p
roblems.
Either goals or objectives are missing, inappropriate, or have severe problems.
5 points
3 points 2 points
1 point
Presentation of Workshop #1
Complete, clear description of presentation:
-
Problems encountered
-
Solutions to problems
-
Workshop outcomes
-
Successes
-
Things to be done differently
in the next presentation
-
overall impression of workshop
Very good
Mostly complete, clear description of presentation with few unclear areas or 1 missing element:
-
Problems encountered
-
So
lutions to problems
-
Workshop outcomes
-
Successes
-
Things to be done differently
next presentation
-
overall impression of workshop
Somewhat complete, clear description of presentation with some unclear areas or 2 missing elements:
-
Problems encountered
-
Solutions to problems
-
Workshop outcomes
-
Successes
-
Things to be done differently
next presentation
-
overall impression of workshop
Not complete or clear description of presentation with many unclear areas or 3+ missing elements:
-
Pro
blems encountered
-
Solutions to problems
-
Workshop outcomes
-
Successes
-
Things to be done differently
next presentation
-
overall impression of workshop
Workshop #1
5 points
3 points
2 points
1 point
Pattern
Workshop includes
all
: -
Introduction with workshop goals & objectives
-
Reading -
Discussion of the reading -
Presentation of the topic -
Interactive element(s), activities -
Participant
s share
activity products -
Participants customize the
information
or activity -
Wrap up/review
-
Q and A session
-
Participant evaluation Very good workshop with nice polishing.
Workshop omits 1 element:
-
Introduction with workshop goals & objectives
-
Reading -
Discussion of the reading -
Presentation of the topic -
Interactive element(s), activities -
Participant
s share
activity products -
Participants customize the
information or activity -
Wrap up/review
-
Q and A session
-
Participant evaluation Workshop omits 2 elements:
-
Introduction with workshop goals & objectives
-
Reading -
Discussion of the reading -
Presentation of the topic -
Interactive element(s), activities -
Participant
s share
activity products -
Participants customize the
information
or activity -
Wrap up/review
-
Q and A session
-
Participant evaluation Workshop omits 3+ elements: -
Introduction with workshop goals & objectives
-
Reading -
Discussion of the reading -
Presentation of the topic -
Interactive element(s), act
ivities -
Participant
s share
activity products -
Participants customize the
information or activity -
Wrap up/review
-
Q and A session
-
Participant evaluation ATDOP at UO
В©2012 AEI, University of Oregon
2
11/0
7/2012
В 4 points
3 points 2 points
1 point
PowerPoint, handouts, reading, timing, presenter notes, etc.
All elements are present, support the workshop appropriately, are of excellent quality, and include citations as appropriate.
Handouts #2 and 5 lack a URL or citation.
One element is missing, or additional elements somewhat support the workshop, or quality could be improved. Citations are included as appropriate.
Two elements are missing, or some do not support the workshop, or are of poor quality. Citations are included as appropriate.
Three elements are missing, or many do not support the workshop, or many are of poor quality. Citations may be missing.
5 points
3 points 2 points
1 point
Rules
Workshop follows all the rules: hands on, focused on
listening, speaking or pronunciation, interactive, and includes techniques and topics from the ATDOP course
Very good
Workshop does not follow one rule, but other rules are followed.
Workshop does not follow two rules, but other rules are followed.
Workshop does not follow three rules.
Workshop #2
5 points
3 points 2 points
1 point
Pattern
Workshop includes
all
: -
Introduction with workshop goals & objectives
-
Reading -
Discussion of the reading -
Presentation of the topic -
Interactive element(s), activities -
Participant
s share
activity products -
Participants customize the
information or activity -
Wrap up/review
-
Q and A session
-
Participant evaluation Workshop omits 1 element:
-
Introduction with workshop goals & objectives
-
Reading -
Discussion of the reading -
Presentation of the topic -
Interactive element(s), activities -
Participant
s share
activity products -
Participants customize the
information or activity -
Wrap up/review
-
Q and A session
-
Participant evaluation Workshop omits 2 elements: -
Introduction with worksho
p goals & objectives
-
Reading -
Discussion of the reading -
Presentation of the topic -
Interactive element(s), activities -
Participant
s share
activity products -
Participants customize the
information or activity -
Wrap up/review
-
Q an
d A session
-
Participant evaluation Workshop omits 3+ elements: -
Introduction with workshop goals & objectives
-
Reading -
Discussion of the reading -
Presentation of the topic -
Interactive element(s), activities -
Participant
s share
activity products -
Participants customize the
information or activity -
Wrap up/review
-
Q and A session
-
Participant evaluation 5
points
3 points 2 points
1 point
PowerPoint, handouts, reading, timing, presenter notes, etc.
All elements are
present, support the workshop appropriately, are of excellent quality, and include citations as appropriate.
Slide #6 is missing a URL
One
element is missing, or additional elements somewhat support the workshop, or quality could be improved. Citations ar
e included as appropriate.
Two
elements are missing, or some do not support the workshop, or are of poor quality. Citations are included as appropriate.
Three elements are missing, or many do not support the workshop, or many are of poor quality. Citations
may be missing.
5 points
3 points 2 points
1 point
Rules
:
Workshop follows all the rules: hands on, focused on
listening, speaking or pronunciation, interactive, and includes techniques and topics from the ATDOP course
Very good
Workshop does not follow one rule, but other rules are followed.
Workshop does not follow two rules, but other rules are followed.
Workshop does not follow three rules.
4 points
3
points 2 points
1 point
Organization and Organization and presentation Organization and presentation Organization and presentation make Organization and presentation ATDOP at UO
В©2012 AEI, University of Oregon
3
11/0
7/2012
В Presentation;
Mechanics
make the report
easy to read; the report
is almost completely free of spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.
PPT had some grammar errors and some slides in PPT #2 were difficult to read.
make the report
somewhat easy to read; the report
has some spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors, but they don’t interfere with comprehensibility.
the report
not as easy to read as it could be; the report
has many spelling
, grammar, and punctuation errors, and they interfere at times with comprehensibility.
make the report
difficult to read; the report
has many spelling, grammar, punctuation errors that interfere with comprehensibility.
Total Points: (
50 points possible)
48
points –
96
%
Comments:
You’ve done an excellent job with your report and with both workshops. You made some thoughtful and effective changes to Workshop #1 and I love how the workshops compliment one another.
You’ve worked hard and your written report is clear and understandable.
It appears that your workshops are fun and engaging, and your participants should learn a lot!
Автор
jvs80
Документ
Категория
Без категории
Просмотров
16
Размер файла
84 Кб
Теги
project, yulii, rubric, final
1/--страниц
Пожаловаться на содержимое документа