The Holocaust - Separating Fact From Fictionкод для вставкиСкачать
The Holocaust - Separating Fact From Fiction
"After the Holocaust, we can do anything we want." — Golda Meir, Israeli Prime Minister THE HOLOCAUST: SEPARATING FACTS FROM FICTION By Big D.W., Tim Entes and Phil Yosatanae, 2009 Illustrations by an Anonymous Culture Warrior ALICE IN HOLOCAUST LAND From Germar Rudolf, Lectures on the Holocaust (2005), available online: It is important to realize what significance the Holocaust has assumed in western societies. The Holocaust is dealt with by countless: – museums – monuments – commemoration days – orations – books – periodicals – newspaper reports – speeches and conferences – university chairs – documentary and entertainment films – criminal law, criminal proceedings, censorship … And the above list is certainly incomplete. So, if I claim that the Holocaust is the most important of all historical topics, I am not saying that because it suits me personally or because I consider this importance to be appropriate. A factual analysis of the western value system enables us to conclude that the Holocaust is something like an absolute zero point of our moral value system, the ultimate evil. No doubt this is what former director of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, Michael Berenbaum, had in mind when in 2000 he said: “As I observe young people in relativistic societies seeking an absolute for morals and values, they now can view the Holocaust as the transcendental move away from the relativistic, and up into the absolute where the Holocaust confronts absolute Evil [=Nazism] and thus find fundamental values.” …. Naturally this characterization of the Holocaust [as “absolute evil”] confers upon the topic a theological dimension. Although the concept “evil” can be viewed from a non-theological perspective, for example through moral philosophy or evolutionary ethics, to define absolute evil is absolutist, fundamentalist, dogmatic and as such places the topic beyond scientific analysis. Other aspects of the Holocaust indicate that the way the western world deals with it has now reached a religious dimension. A re-reading of the above list attests to that. For some time now the historic places and museums of the Holocaust have become places of pilgrimage where relics of all sorts are on display (hair, spectacles, suitcases, shoes, gastight doors, etc.). Don’t the passionate orations on remembrance days remind you of a religious repentance service? Are there not everywhere the high priests who with raised index finger admonish us how to behave in matters Holocaust and all that is connected with it? They advise us how to treat the perpetrators, the victims, their descendants, their countries, their customs, their demands, etc. They also advise us on how we are to think, to feel, to act, to remember, to live if we wish to be known as good human beings. (p. 9-10) This scene of Israeli brutality is repeated just about every day against Palestinians, but you won’t hear about it in the Jewish-owned media. Then at regular intervals this brutality becomes a veritable mass slaughter, as in the 1982 bombing of Lebanon, killing 20,000 civilians, and the Gaza massacre in Feb. 2009, when 1400 civilians, including over 400 children, were intentionally killed. To help justify such continual crimes against humanity, Jewish suffering during World War II is transformed into something Way, Way Bigger than it ever was, giving Zionist Jews and their gullible Fellow Travelers and Useful Idiots, especially misguided Fundamentalist Christians, * a pretext to murder and oppress Palestinians and anyone else who is perceived as an obstacle to their goal of controlling the entire Middle East and in fact the Whole World.… And the Jewish-controlled U.S. provides them with over $8 MILLION A DAY in order to help them do this! * Zionist Jews love the support, especially financial, that Zionist Christians help provide, but they despise Christians nonetheless, just as they despise, even hate Jesus Christ. The Jewish Talmud, their authoritative book of Rabbinical teaching describes Christ, the Bastard (Kallah 51A) as the offspring of a Jewish whore and a Roman soldier (Sanhedrin 106A) who is now in hell in boiling excrement (Gittin 57A). Jewish Victimhood during World War II, called the “Holocaust”, has taken on monstrous proportions in order to help defend and permit the monstrous behavior of Zionist Jews. The reality of Jewish suffering has been exploited beyond all reasonable measure and is mixed with countless lies in order to facilitate a diabolically-inspired and apocalyptic totalitarian agenda orchestrated by powerful Jewish elites seeking world domination. For this evil purpose Jewish suffering has been made to trump and displace all other suffering and has become … THE HOLOHOAX . Even the Russian and Polish governments now admit that the chimneys at Auschwitz were built after the war , in 1947 . Everything had to be put in place in order to convince the right people — that is, the most powerful and influential people — among the victorious Allies that the establishment of the rogue, criminal, and genocidal state of Israel was not only profitable for them, by means of present and future bribes and kickbacks, but also feasible, considering the disproportionate opposition to such establishment among both politicians and other social elites, and the general population as well. See http://www.zundelsite.org/news_english/0033_Wiesel_impostor.html THE CREED OF THE CHURCH OF THE (NOT SO) HOLY HOAX I believe in one Holocaust®, with Power almighty, creator of all correct attitudes in heaven and on earth, conceived in Hollywood and born of the New York media, source of Jewish immunity and exemption from all criminal responsibility and criticism; I believe in Six Million Jews who suffered under Adolf Hitler and were gassed, made into soap and lampshades and cremated, and never buried. At the end of the 20th century they arose again, to haunt the living and the dead. I believe in the State of Israel, the Holocaust's miraculously conceived Son, the Lord and Dictator of all U.S. Foreign policy; I believe in the Spirit of Zionism, our Universal Master and Enforcer of Discourse, Who speaks through the Jewish-owned and controlled Media, Academia, Art and Entertainment World, and through its other Jewish prophets, our Masters, and also through their Gentile fellow-travelers; the Spirit begotten by Satan and itself begetting both the Power and the Son and nourished and strengthened by them in mutual Trinitarian dialectic, ever-growing while feeding on the clueless Gentile world. I believe in Elie Wiesel and the geysers of blood, and Arnold Friedman and the color-coded crematory smoke. I believe in the holy Shoah Biz Church, the Communist Saints, no forgiveness of German sins or those of Holocaust revisionists and Zionist critics, the resurrection of lies, and the shelf- life everlasting of the Auschwitz gas chamber stories. Amen. * * Based on Michael Hoffman's shorter “Creed of the Church of the Shoa”. Hoffman also comments: “You can deny the Virgin Birth…. You can claim Blessed Mary was a harlot. You can deny the Resurrection. You can deny the Israeli holocaust against Palestinians and the Allied holocaust against Dresden. All of those are mere ‘opinions’ of men. The only divine truth is execution gas chambers in Auschwitz. This is what the ‘Shoah’ theology has created: the de-sacrilization of Christianity and state-enforced belief in Holocaustianity. The ‘Shoah’ theology represents the gradual erosion of the claims of the New Testament and the increasing supremacy of Orthodox Judaism's weltanschauung [worldview].” ( http://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2009/02/creed-of- church-of-shoah.html; www.revisionisthistory.org ) Jews are taught that it is their God-given right (even if they don’t believe in God, as is the case with most of them) to despoil others, since they are the “Chosen People” … Chosen by whom is another mystery…. Here we see Jews “getting what they deserve” from their Gentile (non-Jewish) neighbors. Just as they despoiled the Egyptians when God freed them from the oppression of Pharaoh, most Jews are taught that they have a right to swindle and steal from non-Jews, since they are “chosen”, and the Talmud says so. * * The words "goi" and "akum" are derogatory terms for Christians or Gentiles. In Babha Kama (113b) it says: "It is permitted to deceive a Goi." In Chaschen Hamm (182, 7 Hagah) it says: "If a Jew is doing business with an Akum and a fellow Israelite comes along and defrauds the Akum, either by false measure, weight or number, he must divide his profit with his fellow Israelite, since both had a part in the deal…." In Mishna Sanhedryn 57 it says: "Thou shalt not do injury to your neighbour, but it is not said, 'Thou shalt not do injury to a goy.'" In Schultchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348 it says: "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which consequently is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples. An orthodox Jew is not bound to observe principles of morality towards people of other tribes. He may act contrary to morality, if profitable to himself or to Jews in general." "You cannot have peace with people who do not internalise the concept of 'love thy neighbour'. This is almost a paradox, because if they [the Jews] love their neighbour, they cease to be who they are. ...What is the difference between Jews and Christians theoretically? Christians are basically Jews who love their neighbour, so they are committed to the universal concept of humanity, whereas Judaism is tribalism." (Gilad Atzmon, former Jew) * Because Gentiles are not human, Gentiles are owed no debt of morality or decency — not honesty [Baba Kamma 113a], not property [Baba Mezia 24a], not even life! — "The best of the Gentiles should all be killed" Soferim 15, 10 Other related quotes from the Talmud: "The seed of the goyim (Gentiles) is like an animal." Sanhedrin 74b "All Gentile children are animals." Yebamoth 98a See also The Talmud Unmasked and The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians , both by Rev. I. B. Pranaitis (available online). MODERN JEWISH AGGRESSION From a declassified Joint Chiefs of Staff paper, March, 1948, on "Force Requirements for Palestine", anticipating the termination of the British Mandate: "Zionist strategy will seek to involve [the United States] in a continuously widening and deepening series of operations intended to secure maximum Jewish objectives....initial Jewish sovereignty over a portion of Palestine...acceptance by the great powers of the right to unlimited immigration...the extension of Jewish sovereignty over all of Palestine...the expansion of "Eretz Israel" into Transjordan and into portions of Lebanon and Syria, and....the establishment of Jewish military and economic hegemony over the entire Middle East.... "...All stages of the program are equally sacred to the fanatical concepts of the Jewish leaders. The program is openly admitted by same leaders, and has been privately admitted to United States officials by responsible leaders of the presently dominant Jewish group — the Jewish Agency." "We must expel Arabs and take their places." -- David Ben Gurion, Israel’s first Prime Minister, 1937, Ben Gurion and the Palestine Arabs , Oxford University Press, 1985. "Let us not ignore the truth among ourselves ... politically we are the aggressors and they defend themselves... The country is theirs, because they inhabit it, whereas we want to come here and settle down, and in their view we want to take away from them their country." -- David Ben Gurion, quoted on pp 91-92 of Noam Chomsky's Fateful Triangle , which appears in Simha Flapan's "Zionism and the Palestinians,” pp 141-42 citing a 1938 speech. "If I knew that it was possible to save all the children of Germany by transporting them to England, and only half by transferring them to the Land of Israel, I would choose the latter, for before us lies not only the numbers of these children but the historical reckoning of the people of Israel." -- David Ben- Gurion (Quoted on pp 855-56 in Shabtai Teveth's Ben-Gurion in a slightly different translation). "After the Holocaust, we can do anything we want." -- Golda Meir, Israeli Prime Minister "I want to tell you something very clear, don't worry about American pressure on Israel -- we, the Jewish people control America, and the Americans know it." – Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, announced in an Israeli Cabinet session, October 3, 2001, reported on Kol Yisrael radio. “Hatred is a Jewish virtue.” -- Rabbi Solveichik, interviewed in “First Things”, a Jewish-subsidized, Zionist, pro-"War on Terror" (i.e. pro-USrael Empire) nominally "Catholic" magazine. Another holocaust you won't hear about is the horrible massacre of 90,000 Christians delivered and sold to the Jews for slaughter by the Persian King Cyrus after he retook Jerusalem from the Byzantines in 615 A.D. Yes - Jews purchased 90,000 Christians from the Persians, not to be used as slaves, but only in order to have the diabolical pleasure of torturing and murdering them! This hatred and murder of Christians continues today, only through proxies such as Muslim and Hindu extremists, and above all the US government and military, the Jewish elites' ever-compliant — because bribed and blackmailed — and powerful weapon of choice since World War I especially. The Jews are long experts at the practice of "divide and conquer," and getting others to do their dirty work. But when they are forced to do it themselves, as in committing mass murder against Israel's neighbors, they use the media to distract the public away from themselves, as in the frequently recurring case of attacking the Catholic Church for sex scandals that the Jews themselves orchestrate, or setting up a "terrorist attack" as in 9-11 or the June 2009 shooting of a police officer at the Holocaust Museum in Washington. The supposed "anti-semitic" and "lone nut" James von Brunn slipped in through high security, not with a handgun but with a rifle to kill the black officer — a good example of Jewish racial "divide and conquer" strategy (see Jones, op. cit. below and culturewars.com, passim ) — at a time when Israel needs to regain world and especially US public support (largely diminished after its Feb. 2009 slaughter in Gaza) as it prepares to launch an attack on Iran, which it continually vilifies in the media with many lies. As they say, "In the dirty world of politics, nothing happens by chance." Mt 10.16 “Behold, I send you out as sheep in the midst of wolves; so be cunning as serpents and innocent as doves. 17 Beware of men; for they will deliver you over to courts, and scourge you in their synagogues, 18 and you will be dragged before governors and kings for my sake, to bear testimony before them and the pagans....22 and you will be hated by all for my name's sake. But he who endures to the end will be saved…. 28 And do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul; rather fear him who can destroy both soul and body in hell.” Jn 15. 20 “ If they [the Jews] persecuted me, they will persecute you; if they kept my word, they will keep yours also. 21 But all this they will do to you on my account, because they do not know him who sent me. 22 If I had not come and spoken to them, they would not have sin; but now they have no excuse for their sin. 23 He who hates me hates my Father also. 24 If I had not done among them the works which no one else did, they would not have sin; but now they have seen and hated both me and my Father. 25 It is to fulfill the word that is written in their law, 'They hated me without a cause.' ” So the Question is… Do You Want to be a “DUM” Sheep Like These Three Brainwashed Fools and Just Accept the Lies Being Told You by the Jewish “Masters Of Discourse” and Dictators of Political Correctness, Who Control the Media, Hollywood, and Education, as well as the Publishing, Advertising, and Art World, and are Supported by their Prostitute Gentile “Amen” Corner? Or is the Truth More Important to You? Remember… Only Live Fish Can Swim Against the Current. It’s a Lot Harder than Going with the Flow, but Those Who Do Grow Stronger. Dead and Dying Fish Can Only Be Carried Down…. The "Holocaust" is ultimately about the rogue, criminal, and genocidal state of Israel and about silencing all opposition to its crimes against humanity, while it is aided and abetted by the US and its allies in crime like Britain, and about silencing all opposition to the continuous and growing Jewish hegemony over more and more of the world. Appendix: Various Facts and Statements on The "Holocaust" and Historical Revisionism The Revisionist case is broadly as follows: · There exists no documentary evidence whatsoever that there ever was a decision on the part of Hitler or the National Socialist state to physically murder all the Jews of Europe. There is, however, an abundance of evidence for the decision to persecute, disempower and expel all Jews from Europe · There is no physical evidence whatsoever for the existence of homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz or indeed anywhere else. There is, however, abundant evidence for the widespread use of hydrogen cyanide (Zyklon B) gas and gas chambers for delousing and disinfection against typhus. No one has yet been able to produce, draw or describe a homicidal gas chamber or produce a photograph or plan of one, because no one has ever seen a homicidal gas chamber. · No one has ever seen a homicidal gas chamber because they did not exist. The gas chambers shown to thousands of visitors to Auschwitz are, by the admission of the museum authorities, post- war reconstructions. Common images of gas chambers from other locations are either disinfestation chambers or more commonly morgues, air-raid shelters (often gas-tight) or crematoria. Common images of the gassing of Jews – deportees boarding and disembarking from trains, mountains of eyeglasses and shoes, piles of corpses, crematoria chimneys are just that – people and trains, eyeglasses and shoes, corpses, smoking chimneys, no more, no less — they do not constitute evidence of mass gassing. · Not only is there no physical evidence for the existence of homicidal gas chambers, there is substantial physical, architectural, topographical, geographical and forensic evidence against their existence. The critical evidence is in three reports all resulting from investigations at the site itself at Auschwitz. The first and most famous of these was the Leuchter report commissioned by Ernst Zündel in 1988. Fred Leuchter, an expert on executions by gas in the U.S. visited Auschwitz and conducted a forensic examination, which was presented in court as proving conclusively that there were no homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz. Leuchter’s findings and conclusions were refined and confirmed by a forensic study carried out by German chemist Germar Rudolf and by a forensic examination and report commissioned by the Auschwitz State museum and conducted by Institute of Forensic Research in Krakow. · The gassing and cremation of the numbers claimed, in the time claimed and with the facilities claimed, is simply not possible. Some of the evidence for this conclusion comes from studies of individual gas executions performed in the United States, any study of which will show how hard it is to kill one person safely and efficiently, let alone the hundreds claimed. · The numbers of Jews killed by the Nazis, usually held to be around six million, is grossly exaggerated. This is largely because of greatly inflated pre-war Jewish population figures and underestimated Jewish survival and emigration figures. · The context of much of the evidence for the Holocaust narrative was the Nuremberg Trials – an extraordinary and unprecedented set of trials of the vanquished by the victors with little attempt to find or to tell the truth. Without the evidence generated by these proceedings, there would be no significant evidence that the extermination of Jews took place at all. The legitimacy of the court itself was questionable, its procedures were a disgrace with defendants denied basic procedural rights and with much of the evidence presented in the form of survivor testimony taken at face value or confessions beaten and tortured out of the hapless defendants. As a matter of record, the key confession of Auschwitz Commandant, Rudolf Hoess, was obtained through torture and coercion. (6) · Overall there is very little evidence for the established Holocaust narrative. Hard evidence is elusive, and what evidence as does exist is built largely on eyewitness reports, confessions and hearsay. Witness reports, notoriously unreliable anyway, are in this case totally false. Many key witnesses have already been demolished in the witness box and many noted ones, such as those by Rudolf Vrba, Felipe Muller, Kurt Gerstein and Rudolf Hoess, are now partially or completely discredited. · Many key elements of the Holocaust narrative have already been disproved to the extent that even establishment Holocaust writers have conceded their inaccuracy. Examples of these are the Jews-into-soap story – the long disproved story of how the Nazis used the bodies of gassed Jews to make soap - the use of “steam chambers” to steam victims to death, and the existence of homicidal gas chambers at concentration camps in Germany itself such as Dachau and Buchenwald. All claims were made at Nuremberg, and all have subsequently been quietly discarded. Most telling is the quiet downgrading of the figures of victims illustrated by the removal of nineteen signs at Auschwitz, which told visitors in nineteen languages that four million Jews died in the camp. These have now been replaced with signs claiming a million and a half (still claimed by revisionists to be a significant exaggeration). Revisionist research seems to have been carried out in a scholarly manner, is well supported by evidence and is presented in a calm and restrained way. That some revisionists (not all) have histories in far-right activism is true. That some (not all) exhibit anti-Jewish sentiment is also true, although this may in part be due to the assaults that many have come under from Jews and Jewish organisations. In conclusion, it has been proven that 1) there never was an official plan on the part of Hitler or any other part of the Nazi regime systematically and physically to eliminate every Jew in Europe; and 2) that there never existed homicidal gas-chambers. Also, the numbers of Jewish victims have been intentionally exaggerated for ideological and self-serving purposes. Acceptance of Holocaust dogma is a sign of submission to the Tel Aviv–New York Axis, a sign of the new colonialism. [Iranian president] Ahmadinejad refused it just as St Paul refused to accept the Noahide laws: not because St Paul wanted to partake of pagan sacrifices, but because he did not want to take his orders from the Jews. No one can legislate historical truth. In so far as historical truth can be established at all, it must be found by unfettered historical research, with historians arguing over the evidence and the facts, testing and disputing each other's claims without fear of prosecution or persecution "By subverting the Holocaust you also subvert the existence of the State of Israel," says Dr. Oscar Levy [Jews well know] the usefulness of the gas chamber tale for blackmailing the world for financial gain and political capital in the Middle East. The holocaust is a racist concept for focusing solely on the slaughter of Jews. From Michael Hoffman, author of Judaism Discovered — The rabbinic "Shoah" is a Trojan horse inside Christianity and its refutation does indeed concern "faith and morality" since it betrays the Gospel by derogating Calvary and substituting it with Auschwitz as the central martyrdom of western history. It is a commonplace of history that in every war atrocity propaganda is employed and exaggeration is a centerpiece of that propaganda. In the case of virtually every conflict except World War II, the record is corrected after the embers of bellicose passion have cooled....in Auschwitz the plaque that was formerly displayed to Pope John Paul II as noting four million deaths has been quietly altered to a figure far lower. "The Holocaust" in its manifestation as the rabbinic "Shoah" mystification, incorporated into the Catholic Church by the current and previous Roman pontiff, and made a litmus test for ecclesiastical office, represents nothing less than the derogation of Calvary as the central ontological reality of martyrdom, in favor of Auschwitz. By way of proof we have only to point to the fact that no one goes to jail for denying Chris's death on the Cross or His Resurrection from the dead. Only the West’s most sacred icon, Holocaustolatry, is so protected. From David Irving, widely considered the world's premier World War II historian — "Adolf Hitler had never planned any genocide of the Jews: I pointed to the logical evidence that ran counter to any plan of total genocide—the proof that Nazi Germany had allowed 200,000 Jews to emigrate by 1941 ; the fact that as late as 1944 there were still several exchanges of thousands of Jews from the camps at Bergen Belsen and Vittel for expatriate Germans released from Allied internment; and the clear evidence that even when the Auschwitz site was about to be overrun in January 1945 the Nazis either evacuated the 70,000 Jews still there to the west (including Anne Frank) or left those who so chose (including Anne’s sick father Otto) in the camp hospital being tended by SS doctors until the Russians came. In Austria it is illegal to say such things, it appears. The truth is no defence against the Verbotsgesetz . Unfortunately, my routine warning that 'Nobody in their right mind can deny that the Nazis did kill millions of Jews,' was edited out." ( Banged Up , p. 68; available online) From an interview with Norman Finkelstein, professor and author of The Holocaust Industry [available online] Anas Altikriti: ... You have written a book on the Holocaust industry, how it’s become, well, an industry, basically. Tell us a little about that. What’s your take on that? Particularly the fact that every year we have this discussion, this debate within the Muslim communities around Europe as to whether they should go, they shouldn’t go, and such. Norman Finkelstein: They should definitely not go. Anas Altikriti: Why? Norman Finkelstein: Because the Holocaust Memorial Day has nothing to do with the Nazi holocaust. The Holocaust industry has nothing to do with the Nazi holocaust. All it is, is an ideological weapon of Israel and its supporters to immunize Israel and its supporters from criticism. It has nothing to do with the actual event. These people don’t care about the actual event. They don’t care about the survivors. It’s a manipulative public relations device, and I think nobody should have any truck with it. You should stay away from it, you should boycott it, and say that you’re not going to allow the Nazi holocaust to be turned into an ideological club to keep dissenting opinion in line. I would never—I’ve never even gone to the U.S. Holocaust museum in Washington. I’m not going to have anything to do with that. My parents suffered too much, endured too much, for their suffering to be turned into a weapon to justify war. Just look at what happened, the build-up to the war in Iraq in 2003. Anyone who dissented— anyone who dissented from an illegal war of aggression was accused of being an appeaser of Hitler. Now can you imagine that? The Nazi holocaust has now become the main ideological weapon for justifying wars of aggression. That’s a fact. Every time Israel and the United States want to launch an illegal war of aggression, what do they charge? That their enemy is Hitler. Ahmadinejad, he’s Hitler. Hezbollah’s Hitler. Hamas is Hitler. Every time they want to commit an illegal war of aggression, they use the Nazi holocaust to justify it. Now that’s the ultimate irony. The Nazi holocaust has become the chief, the main ideological weapon for waging illegal wars of aggression. Why should anyone have anything to do with that? Stay away from those memorials. Let the Holocaust-mongers and the warmongers attend those memorials. No self-respecting, decent, peace-loving person, someone who loves justice, would have anything to do with those memorials. From "Who Needs the Holocaust?" by Israel Shamir The American Jewish establishment, including the Zionist Organization of America and the Anti- Defamation League...is not against revisionism as such. This organization pioneered the art of denying history and published, at the expense of American taxpayer, a booklet called "Deir Yassin: History of a Lie". Deir Yassin was a peaceful village the Jewish terrorist groups Etzel and Lehi attacked on the 9th of April 1948, and massacred its men, women and children. I do not want to repeat the gory tale of sliced off ears, gutted bellies, raped women, torched men, bodies dumped in stone quarries or the triumphal parade of the murderers.... ZOA revisionists...discount the eye-witness accounts of the survivors, the Red Cross, the British police, Jewish scouts and other Jewish observers, who were present at the scene of massacre. They discount even Ben Gurion's apology, since after all, the commanders of these gangs became in their turn prime ministers of the Jewish state. For ZOA, only the testimony of the murderers has any validity. That is, if the murderers are Jews. If the Jews are the victims, these same American Zionist organizations spare no effort in challenging revisionism. The "revisionists" risked their lives and fortunes trying to undermine what they call "the Myth of the Holocaust". One can understand their interest. Nowadays, one may openly doubt the Immaculate Conception or (maybe) challenge the founding myths of Israel. Yet the cult of the Holocaust retains a unique, court-enforced prohibition against any investigation that might cast a doubt on its sacred dogma. Dogmas have a way of attracting critical minds. From "Vampire Killers" by Israel Shamir A courageous step was taken by Dr Norman Finkelstein in his best-selling expose The Holocaust Industry . ...A Jewish organization called "Lawyers without Borders" has already sued him in France. ...Finkelstein set out to explore the secret of our discrete Jewish charm, a charm that opens American hearts and the coffers of Swiss bankers. His conclusion is that we do it by appealing to European and American guilt feelings. "The Holocaust cult has proven to be an indispensable ideological weapon. Through its deployment, one of the world's most formidable military powers, with a horrendous human rights record, has cast itself as a victim state, and the most successful ethnic group in the US has acquired victim status." Finkelstein carries out a brilliant analysis of the Holocaust cult, and comes to a startling discovery: it is but a shabby construct of a few clichés stitched together by the sorrowful voice of Elie Wiesel in a limo. ...the Holocaust cult...solved the eternal problem of the rich and influential, warding off the envy and hate of the poor and exploited. It allowed Mark Rich and other swindlers to cheat and steal, it allowed the Israeli army to murder children and starve women with impunity. His opinion is shared by many Israelis. Ari Shavit, a well-known Haaretz writer, expressed it best in 1996, when the Israeli Army killed over a hundred civilian refugees in Kana, Lebanon: "We may murder with impunity, because the Holocaust museum is on our side". Boaz Evron, Tom Segev and other Israeli writers have articulated the same notion. The two Gods, Holocaust and Democracy, are cleverly set in a complementary relationship. The message is clear: unless Democracy is in place, a Holocaust is inevitable. This is a clear case of misunderstanding. Just recently Hamas was democratically elected to rule Palestine, and it was not approved by the US and Israel. Russia had a democratically elected Parliament in 1993, but it was not approved by the US and Israel. Belarus has a democratically elected President but he is not approved by the US and Israel. Thus, Democracy is not required: a regime should be approved by the Jews. And no regime will be approved by the Jews, unless it is controlled by the Jews. Thus we arrive to another truism: unless a country is controlled by the Jews, a Holocaust is inevitable. Or, even in simpler form: it is Yisrael, or Esau. If Yisrael can’t control Esau, Esau will kill him. This is a traditional Jewish point of view. (Several of Shamir's books are available online) From the Jewish Chronicle 25/04/2008 A university has withdrawn a researcher’s fellowship after he published an article claiming that the gas chambers of Auschwitz never existed. Nicholas Kollerstrom posted the article, "The Auschwitz 'Gas Chamber' Illusion", on the website of the revisionist Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust. He claimed that only one million Jews died in the war and that “the only intentional mass extermination program in the concentration camps of WW2 was targeted at Germans”. Dr Kollerstrom, 61, an honorary research fellow at University College London until Tuesday, stood by the claims this week, but expressed surprise that they had caused offence. And he insisted the university “had not actually told me what’s so terrible about the article”. He complained that he had been accused of “thought-crime” after spending months researching it. And he added: “If a smaller number were gassed, then surely the Jewish community should be pleased that it wasn’t so ghastly.” Here is an extract from one of his postings on the CODOH website: “Zyklon-B was used at Auschwitz, as an insecticide. It was vital in attempting to maintain hygiene that mattresses be deloused. Cyanide gas was absorbed on to clay-type granules, designed to make the deadly gas as ‘safe’ as it could be. “If you go to Auschwitz today, you can’t see any authentic gas chambers. You see stone huts, and experts have testified that they could not have been used to gas people, owing to problems in sealing them up (Zyklon-B released its cyanide gas rather slowly).” In another, he wrote: “The verdicts of Nuremberg were made final and binding for the post-war FRG [Federal Republic of Germany]. Germany has since paid a hundred billion Deutschmarks to Israel by way of Holocaust- compensation — clearly, that needs to be refunded. “Germany should take the advice of Iranian leader Ahmadinajad and stop paying it, because that funding provides undue motivation for holocaust ‘memories’. Germany is helping to maintain the holocaust legend, by thus aiding the state of Israel.” THE EMPEROR HAS NO CLOTHES! The Facts vs. "Holocaust" Fictions and Other Related Deceptions By Michael Walsh From Witness to History, Chapter 23 (available online) Western leaders bearing responsibility for the 2nd World War sought desperately to cover up their tracks. As in the USSR the true nature of Hitler’s Germany, the causes of war, the conduct of it and its aftermath, needed to be kept from the [public]. Guaranteeing Poland’s illegal occupation of German territory would hardly justify the scale of the tragedy and could hardly explain the dismemberment of Germany, the handing over of eleven independent nations to Stalin’s dictatorship, the excesses of the victors, and the deaths of an estimated 16 million Germans [emphasis added] … not to mention our own losses. There were compelling reasons for hiding the truth, even fifty-years on. But Churchill’s ‘bodyguard of lies to protect the truth’ needed to be insulated also. Hitler’s Germany had to be so thoroughly vilified that few would have the courage to defend it. Those who did—as in the Soviet Union—would find themselves denied a platform or publicly defamed in a modern version of the stocks, leading to probable loss of livelihood. No publisher would dare to allow anyone to point out that the emperor has no clothes. All lies as a consequence have gone unchallenged and have become part of established ‘fact’. GITTA SERENY, HOLOCAUST WRITER “A very disturbing thing has happened to journalism, to the writing of history, and even to justice. In anything to do with the Nazis … any attempt at detachment is considered suspect, any degree of objectivity reprehensible … I have to battle in print against men like Martin Gray ( For Those I Have Loved ) who use these appalling events for self-aggrandisement … but attacking Gray causes wrathful indignation among holocaust dogmatists.”—Gitta Sereny, London Review of Books , April 21st, 1988 SIX MILLION EMPERORS HAVE NO CLOTHES All wars by necessity are accompanied by propaganda and most people are familiar with the lies and exaggerations. But the megalithic scale of the Second World War was such that stories of German troops throwing Belgian babies in the air to catch them on bayonets fell far short of requirements if the victors’ populations were to accept their governments’ version of events, and their own suffering. THE MINISTRY’S SELECTIVE PRESS RELEASE: “We know how the Red Army behaved in Poland in 1920, and in Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Galicia, and Bessarabia only recently. “We must, therefore, take into account how the Red Army will behave when it overruns Central Europe. Unless precautions are taken, the obviously inevitable horrors which will result will throw an undue strain on public opinion in this country. “We cannot reform the Bolsheviks, but we can do our best to save them—and ourselves—from the consequences of their acts. The disclosure of the past quarter of a century will render mere denials unconvincing. The only alternative to denial is to distract public attention from the whole subject. “Experience has shown that the best distraction is atrocity propaganda directed against the enemy. Unfortunately the public is no longer so susceptible as in the days of ‘the corpse factory,’ the ‘mutilated Belgian babies’ and the ‘crucified Canadians’. “Your co-operation is therefore earnestly sought to distract public attention from the doings of the Red Army by your wholehearted support of various charges against the Germans and the Japanese which have been and will be put into circulation by the Ministry. Your expression of belief in such may convince others. I am Sir, your obedient servant. (Signed) H. Hewett, Assistant Secretary “The Ministry can enter into no correspondence of any kind with regard to this communication which should only be disclosed to responsible persons.” Allied Wartime Diplomacy, Edward Rozek— A Pattern in Poland , York/London, 1958 DID SIX MILLION REALLY DIE? All of us are familiar with the photographic evidence of Nazi-inspired genocide; we have seen the pictures, the newsreels taken at Buchenwald, Bergen-Belsen, Dachau. How can it be denied? It is not. What is a matter of dispute, where the film and photographs are genuine, is not the cause of the tragedy but the reasons for it. The popular belief is that these huge mounds of skeletal corpses are proof of a deliberate policy of genocide; caught in the act so to speak. In fact, the physical condition of the camp inmates was not far removed from that of many of the general German population. (See. Chapter 20). There are thousands of photographs and newsreels, admittedly not readily available for obvious reasons, that show German civilians, women and children in a similar state of emaciation. To understand why, one has to understand that much of Germany in the final months of the war resembled a moonscape; the infrastructure had completely disintegrated; road and rail links were hopelessly disrupted and food distribution non-existent. Millions of refugees were fleeing into the Reich, millions more were displaced. Chaos was king. Throughout war-torn Europe and especially in the displaced persons and refugee camps where large numbers congregated, disease; cholera and typhoid were rampant and knew no physical or political borders: IN CZECHOSLOVAKIA: “A typhus epidemic now rages amongst them, and they are said to be dying at the rate of 100 a day.”— London Daily Mail , August 6th, 1945 IN FRANCE: “..... there is a typhoid epidemic in the camp which has already spread to the neighbouring village.”—Louis Clair, The Progressive , January 14th, 1946 IN GERMANY: “By reason of heavy bombing, road communications had been destroyed and no supplies had reached the camp; typhoid fever ensued and hundreds of prisoners had died as a consequence. The allies arrived on the scene and found a terrible situation.”—Cyril Connolly, The Golden Horizon , Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London “The German Army at Bergen had forewarned the British that a full-blown epidemic of typhus had broken out among the prisoners in the camp.”—Douglas Botting, In The Ruins of the Reich , George Allen & Unwin. London, 1985 “Disease of all kinds was rife and in a vast number of cases it was difficult to tell which disease predominated—whether it was typhus, starvation, tubercle or a combination of all three, which was responsible for the shattered wrecks of human beings who formed the majority of the inmates … “there had been no water for about a week owing to damage by (allied) shell fire to the electrical pumping equipment on which the system depended.”—Appendix ‘O’ Chapter VII, Second Army History “Interestingly, this report alluding to the disruption of supplies due to the total war conditions mentions, “meals varied from one to three per day.” “Interesting because the inmates of Belsen were better fed than the German prisoners held by the Americans… 260,000 German POWs held by the Americans after the fighting had ended ‘lived’ (actually 1,200 died) on one potato, a single biscuit, a spoonful of vegetables and some water, a day”.— The Times , 7th March 1995 Such photographs as those taken at Bergen-Belsen could have been taken anywhere in Central Europe, where millions of civilians of many nations faced death through starvation and disease, producing similar mounds of emaciated corpses. In the case of Displaced Persons and concentration camp victims, the causes were deprivation, starvation, typhoid and cholera; not as a deliberate policy but as a direct consequence of the allies determination to totally destroy Germany, leading to unconditional surrender. This may not be palatable, but it is the truth. On a visit that I made to Dachau—and I invite you to do likewise—you will see numerous photographs of inmates, clearly in good health and thoroughly fit, even wearing industrial gloves to protect their hands. Each of us have seen photographs of inmates at the point of liberation who again are obviously in good health. I have yet to hear an explanation as to why in some parts of Germany the liberated were physically fit and in good health, whilst in other parts we see the horrendous results of starvation and disease. We can draw our own conclusions from the fact that the scale and location of such misery or lack of it, is directly related to the destructiveness of the allied war machine. CAMP REALITIES Oswald Pohl, of the S.S Economy and Administration Office, provided incriminating statements relating to camp procedures, but only under torture: “Pohl had signed some incriminating statements after being subjected to severe torture, including a bogus admission that he had seen a gas chamber at Auschwitz in the summer of 1944.”—Senator McCarthy Prior to Pohl being arrested and tortured as a means of procuring ‘evidence of extermination,’ one Heinrich Hoepker, vehemently anti-Nazi who was nevertheless friendly with Oswald Pohl’s wife and as such a frequent visitor between the years 1942-1945, described the S.S officer: “Hoepker noted that Pohl was essentially a mild-mannered and serene person. During a visit to Pohl in the spring of 1944, Hoepker was brought into contact with concentration camp inmates who were working on a local project outside the camp area. He noted that the prisoners worked in a leisurely manner and relaxed atmosphere without any pressure from their guards. “Hoepker declared that Pohl did not hold an emotional attitude towards the Jews, and did not object to his wife entertaining her Jewish friend, Annemarie Jacques, at their home. “By the beginning of 1945, Hoepker was fully convinced that the administrator of the concentration camps was a humane, conscientious and dedicated servant of the task, and he was astonished when he heard later in 1945 of the accusations being made against Pohl and his colleagues. Frau Pohl noted that her husband retained his serenity in the face of adversity until March, 1945, when he visited the camp at Bergen-Belsen, at the time of the typhus epidemic there. Hitherto the camp had been the model of cleanliness and order, but the chaotic conditions of the close of the war had reduced it to a state of extreme hardship. “Pohl, who was unable to alleviate conditions there because of the desperate pass the war had reached by that time, was deeply effected by the experience and, according to his wife, never regained his former state of composure.” HERMAN GOERING “Mass murder! I assure you that we never for a moment had such things in mind. I only thought we would eliminate Jews from positions in big business and government, and that was all. But don’t forget that the Jews carried on a terrific campaign against us too, all over the world.”—Herman Goering from his death cell STATISTICALLY It is an established fact that the Jews in Germany were very few indeed. The Germans who are very good at keeping statistics, never as far as I am aware claimed there to be in excess of 1%, which would number less than 1 million. The Jewish Joint Distribution Committee put the figure at 1,559,600, and have yet to explain why they are claiming compensation for double that figure. [Note—JP: In Samuel Untermeyer’s speech where he called for a ‘holy war’ against Germany (August 1933) he stated that “we must save those 600,000…”] Any reasoned or academic analysis of the alleged program of extermination inevitably leads to gross inconsistencies; so much so that the propagandists have reluctantly beaten a retreat on every so-called extermination camp, until all they are left with is Auschwitz, which conveniently was ‘liberated’ by the Red Army who never allowed outsiders in until 10 years after the war’s end. SHAKY GROUND “Our detailed research (into the holocaust) however mostly establishes only how shaky is the ground we’re on: the consensus of research data often turns out only to be the result of everybody having uncritically copied what everybody else was writing; the actual documentary basis on many matters is frighteningly narrow and is in consequence easily shattered by some find or other. “In all too many matters we are still groping in total darkness. If we are to avert being shown up, in the next few years historical research is going to have to do all it can not only to establish better documentary defences but broader-based ones as well.”—Dr. Hans-Heinrich Wilhelm, University of Riga, 1988 “A large number of testimonials on file here were later proved to be inaccurate when locations and dates could not pass an expert historian’s appraisal.”—Shmuel Krakowski, Director Archives, Yad Vashem, Israel “Much of the personal survivor testimony is unreliable about names, locations or dates... what survivors speak about most is their suffering. Samuel Gringauz, a survivor had harsh words for these personal histories. “In the January 1950 issue of Jewish Social Studies he called the ‘Judaeocentric, logocentric and egocentric’. For him, most of the memoirs were full of ‘preposterous verbosity, exaggeration, dramatic effects, dilettante philosophism, would-be lyricism, unchecked rumors, bias and apologies.”—Raul Hilberg, Jerusalem Post , June 28th, 1986 “The testimony of all witnesses who ‘had seen him (Adolf Eichmann) with their own eyes’ collapsed the moment the question was read out to him.”—Hannah Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem , 1971, p. 208 COMMENTING ON THE DEPORTATION OF FEODUR FEDERENKO, ACCUSED OF WAR CRIMES “I know of no other case in which so many deviations from procedures internationally accepted as desirable occurred.”—Dr. William A Wagenaar, Harvard University Press ALBERT SPEER Even Albert Speer, the Third Reich’s Minister of Armaments, a gifted technician rather than an idealist, and as such ready to compromise on matters of honour, could never bring himself to support the victors’ lies on the extermination allegations. He “...always maintained that he did not know of the death camps in which six million Jews died.” If one had known, surely it would have to be Speer. DACHAU—ANOTHER ALLEGATION IN RETREAT “I was in Dachau for 17 months after the war, as a U.S. War Department Attorney, and can state that there were no gas chambers at Dachau. “What was shown to visitors and sightseers there and erroneously described as a gas chamber was a crematory. “Nor was there a gas chamber in any other the other concentration camps in Germany. We were told that there was a gas chamber at Auschwitz, but since this was in the Russian zone of occupation, we were not permitted to investigate since the Russians would not allow it. “From what I was able to determine in six years of post-war Germany and Austria, there were a number of Jews killed, but the figure of a million was certainly never reached. I interviewed thousands of Jews, former inmates of concentration camps in Germany and Austria, and consider myself as well qualified on the subject as any man.”—Stephen F. Pinter, Our Sunday Visitor , June 14th, 1959 THE WRITING ON THE WALL In 1946, a memorial plaque was unveiled at Dachau by Philip Auerbach, the Jewish State Secretary in the Bavarian Government. The plaque read: ‘This area is being retained as a shrine to the 238,000 individuals who were cremated here.’ Since then, this figure has consistently been revised downwards to its present total of 20,600, who it appears died from typhus and starvation at the end of the war. Note: Auerbach has since been convicted for embezzling money that he claimed for non-existent Jews. It appears that the State Secretary certainly had a way with figures. FURTHER RETREAT It was not long before it was admitted that there had been no extermination camps on territory captured by the western allies. Equally conveniently it was discovered that the extermination camps just happened to have been on territory occupied by the Russians. Dr. Martin Broszat, the anti-Nazi Director of the Institute of Contemporary History in Munich who can lay claim to being a major influence on the genocide issue, admitted in Die Zeit , (August 19th, 1960). ‘That there were no extermination camps on German soil,’ and that instead, one had to look ‘above all to Auschwitz.’ Yet, by general historical consensus the evidence of Auschwitz is overwhelmingly dependent upon the ‘confessions’ of its Commandant, Rudolf Hoess. COMMANDANT OF AUSCHWITZ, RUDOLF HOESS (LONDON, 1960) This book purports to be the testimony of Rudolf Hoess, the Commandant of Auschwitz from 1940 until his arrest by the British Army in 1945. Subjected to torture and brain-washing, ‘his testimony at Nuremberg was delivered in a mindless monotone as he stared blankly into space.’ Even Reitlinger regarded his testimony as hopelessly untrustworthy; a catalogue of wild exaggerations. These included his declaration that 16,000 Jew a day were disposed of—which would have meant 13 million in total! Tortured, his statement appears in American-English idiom yet there is no evidence that Rudolf Hoess could speak any English at all. Tried at Nuremberg and handed over to the Polish Communists in 1947, he was ordered to write the story of his life, which was published as Wspomniena in the Polish language. It is said that the hand-written original exists, but no one has ever seen it. ADOLF EICHMANN Kidnapped by the Israelis in May, 1960, this impudent illegality again had a happy coincidence in that the incident happened just as ‘war crimes investigators found in the archives of the U.S. Library of Congress,’ more than fifteen years after the war’s end, the ‘complete file’ of Eichmann’s department. Needless to say these files were riddled with inconsistencies and errors. FRANZ STENGEL This former commandant of Treblinka is equally interesting and for this we have to be grateful for his reminisces ‘written’—a few days before his death in prison. THE DIARY OF ANNE FRANK First published in 1952, The Diary of Anne Frank , a classical weepy about a Jewish adolescent’s tribulations at the hands of Nazis became an immediate best-seller, succeeded by television and film events. Less well known is the fact that the ‘actual diary’ consisted of just 150 notes. This somewhere along the way transformed itself into a 293-page published tome of a high literary standard dealing with historical events that make it highly unlikely to have been written by any twelve-year old girl. Nor was this the only miracle, for it emerged that many of the notes, corrections and suchlike were written in a ball-point pen; a writing implement that was not invented until 1951, a number of years after the girl is supposed to have died. Hardly surprising therefore that between 1956 and 1958, Meyer Levin, a well known author and journalist successfully sued Otto Frank, Anne’s father, for $50,000 as indemnity for ‘fraud, default and unauthorized employment of ideas’. It appeared that it wasn’t so much a case of The Diary of Anne Frank, as the case of The Diary of Meyer Levin. Furthermore, the handwriting attributed to Anne Frank and the handwriting in the ‘diary’ bear no similarity. When in April, a Swedish investigator wrote to Anne Frank’s father, Otto Frank, requesting permission to come to Switzerland, bringing with him a party of experts to examine the original documents, which had never before been examined, his request was refused by Otto Frank... “who wished no further contact.” Further comment would be superfluous. AUSCHWITZ It is at Auschwitz that the most fanciful statistics appear, and it seems a great shame that the propagandists couldn’t at least get together and agree on a figure. In Olga Legyel’s Five Chimneys (London, 1959) it is claimed that the camp cremated 720 per hour or 17,280 per 24-hour shift. She alleges that a further 8,000 a day were burned in ‘death pits’. This means that between March 1942 and October 1944, the single camp of Auschwitz would have disposed of 21,000,000 Jews … Which happens to be 6 million more than the entire world population of Jews! Reitlinger admitted that only 363,000 inmates ‘were registered at the camp between January 1940 and February 1945.’— The S.S.: Alibi of a Nation , p. 268 Any analysis of propagandist figures exposes a statistical fraud on a ludicrous scale, and a complete absence of hard evidence. “There were no gas chambers at Auschwitz or anywhere else in wartime Europe. On that I state my reputation and career.”—Professor Robert Faurisson “Despite thousands of detailed documents on the crematoria built to dispose of the bodies of typhus victims, not a single piece of documentary evidence has ever been produced to substantiate the existence of even one gas chamber; not an order for construction, a plan, an invoice, or a photograph. During the hundreds of ‘war crimes’ trials, nothing could be produced.—Professor Robert Faurrisson, Le Monde Although millions of gassings are said to have occurred, ‘no one has ever been charged with murder by gassing. That is, no one has ever been charged with operating the alleged gas chambers.”—John Bennett, Secretary, Victoria Council for Civil Liberties PROFESSOR PAUL RASSINIER Professor Paul Rassinier is generally regarded as being the doyen of the revisionist movement. A French Marxist and committed anti-National Socialist, he was arrested by the Germans during the war and interned at Buchenwald and Dora concentration camps between 1943 and 1945. He has always been at the forefront in disproving the allegations of genocide. “I was in Auschwitz from January, 1944 until December, 1944. After the war I heard about the mass murders supposedly perpetrated by the S.S against the Jewish prisoners, and I was perfectly astonished. There were no secrets at Auschwitz.”—Thies Christopherson, Research worker at Auschwitz “In September, 1944 a Commission of the International Red Cross came to the camp for an inspection. They were particularly interested in the camp at Birkenau, although we also had many inspections at Raisko.”—Bunawerk Section, p. 85 “The fact that we were able to receive visits from our relatives at any time demonstrates the openness of the camp administration. Had Auschwitz been a great extermination camp, we would certainly not have been able to receive such visits.”—Thies Christopherson, p. 27 “Auschwitz, despite its emblematic name, was NOT primarily an extermination camp for the Jews and is not the central case through which to study extermination.”—Gite Sereny, Jewish Historian, The New Statesman , November 2nd, 1979 IF NOT AUSCHWITZ, WHERE THEN? Other Jews who have spoken out against what has been described as ‘the hoax of the twentieth century,’ include Beael Chaim, the head of the prestigious Revisionist Press publishing house, Professor Howard Stein, the noted historian at the University of Oklahoma, and Jean-Gabrielle Cohn-Bendit, a writer with the French Guillaume Publishing Group. WILLIAM SHIRER Shirer, the author of the tendentious ‘Rise and Fall of the Third Reich’ alleges that 300,000 Hungarian Jews were done to death in just 46 days (ibid. p. 1156). This would have meant almost the extermination of Hungary’s Jewish population of 380,000. But, according to the Central Statistical Office in Budapest, there were 260,000 Jews living in Hungary—in 1945! A JEW SPEAKS OUT “Why then are they, the Israelis, obstructing all honest research into the six million question? All statistics will so long be controversial until world Jewry and Zionism will be willing to present to the public exact official statistics of the losses. The roadblock to research is due to the fact that from six million dead, one can exact far more reparations than from say 6,000.”—Joseph Ginsburg, Jewish researcher and survivor, Munich NOTE: To date, (West) Germany has paid out 80 billion deutschmarks in ‘compensation’ to Israel, which doesn’t go entirely without gratitude: “… the state of Israel would not have half of its present infrastructure; every train in Israel is German, the ships are German, as well as electricity, a big part of industry … without mentioning the individual pensions paid to survivors.”—Nahum Goldman, In The Name of Israel (1978) NEARLY EVERYBODY WINS The allies get their justification, the Israelis get their 80 billion deutschmarks and the Soviets add another eleven nations to their empire. THE POISONED WELL As Dr. Hans-Heinrich Wilhelm of the University of Riga says, “... research data often turns out only to be the result of everybody having uncritically copied what everybody else was writing.” Indeed, many of the figures bandied about originate in cheap paperbacks churned out by ‘quack- hacks’ out to make a fast buck out of combining the victors’ need for justification and the public lust for scandal. Such nonsense is then assiduously re-cycled with highly imaginative embroidery until it loses all contact with reality—which ironically causes outrage from the professional propagandists astute enough to see the danger this presents. FOR THOSE I LOVED. Martin Gray, Bodley Head, 1973 This book purports to describe the experiences of the author at Treblinka camp in Poland. Gray in fact specialized in selling fake antiques in America before he was attracted to the buck-earning potential of cashing in on the insatiable appetite for holocaust-hype. Even the BBC was sufficiently cautious to ask him why he had waited twenty-eight years to reveal all. AXIS RULE IN OCCUPIED EUROPE, Rafael Lemkin, N.Y. 1943 This Polish-Jew, author of the above title, drew up the UN Geneva Convention which sought to outlaw ‘racism’ whose extermination figures would have meant—according to official Jewish statistics—the extermination of the world’s Jewish population by 1945. According to the World Almanac there were 16 million Jews in the world in 1938; the New York Times puts it at 15 million. DAS DRITTE REICH UND DIE JUDEN: DOCUMENTE UND AUFSATZE, Poliakov, Berlin, 1955 The only evidence was: “The three of four people chiefly involved in drawing up the plan for total extermination are dead, and no documents exist.” How very convenient! THE RISE AND FALL OF THE THIRD REICH, William L. Shirer One would expect this renowned self-styled expert on the Third Reich to have done other than weakly conclude that Hitler’s order for the murder of Jews, ‘apparently was never committed to paper—at least no copy of it has ever been unearthed. It was probably given verbally to Goering, Himmler, Heydrich, who passed it down....’ It seems strange that German officers, who appear fond of taking souvenir pictures of graveside executions, would be so coy about putting their thoughts on paper. THE INCOMPARABLE CRIME, Manvel and Frank, London, 1967, p. 46 The term, ‘final solution’ had its origins in a memorandum issued nine months before the outbreak of war: “Supplementing the task that was assigned to you on 24th, January, 1939, to solve the Jewish problem by means of emigration and evacuation in the best possible way according to conditions.” The supplementary task referred to ‘a total solution (gesamtlosung) of the Jewish question within the area of German influence in Europe.’ Manvel and Frankl substituted the word extermination for emigration, and so the ‘final solution was born’. The alleged final details of the plan to exterminate European Jewry are said to have taken place at the Gross Wansee Conference held in Berlin, 20th, January 1942. Unfortunately again there isn’t the slightest documentary evidence supporting such a plan. It seems, according to Manvel and Frankl that, ‘the minutes are shrouded in the form of officialdom that cloaks the real significance of the words and terminology that are being used.’ Of all the innumerable directives and documents that allegedly passed between Heinrich Himmler, Reinhard Heydrich, Adold Eichmann and Wilhelm Hoess, it seemed that, ‘none had survived.’ THE OTHER KINGDOM, David Rousset, New York, 1947. This book like many others carried extravagant claims about gas chambers at Buchenwald. The anti-Hitler Professor Paul Rassinier, who himself spent a considerable time as an inmate at Buchenwald, effectively proved that no such gas chambers existed; nor was there any program of extermination. Today, it is no longer claimed to have been an extermination camp. CHAINES ET LUMIERES, Abbe Jean-Paul Renard. Professor Paul Rassinier traced the author and asked how he could possibly have testified as to the existence of gas chambers. Renard replied, ‘that others had told him of their existence, and hence had been willing to pose as a witness to things that he had never seen.’ RAVENSBRUCK; THE WOMEN’S CAMP OF DEATH, Denise Dufournier, London, 1948 Traced and found to have no evidence other ‘than vague rumors that Charlotte Borman stated were deliberately spread by Communist political prisoners.’ TEUFEL UND VERDAMTE, Benedikt Kautsky. The author was traced, interviewed and confessed that he had never seen a gas chamber and that he had based his ‘first hand information’ on “what others had told him.” DOCTOR AT AUSCHWITZ, Miklos Nyizli. It has been impossible to trace the author. He is not known to exist. HENRY KISSINGER, EX-U.S SECRETARY OF STATE “Even when Henry Kissinger bemoans some ten relatives whom he calls casualties of Auschwitz, he never gives us names or dates.”—Dr. A.J. App, Ph.D. Since the war and up until his death, Professor Paul Rassinier tracked down and interviewed scores of authors and writers of articles who had claimed first hand experience of extermination. He had never found a single eyewitness; no one who had ever seen a gas chamber much less one in operation. Nor could any of the authors and writers produce a single living witness who had done so. AND FROM THE VICTORS’ PRISONERS: S.S GENERAL ERICH VON DEM BACH-ZELEWSKI An often told story is of how Heinrich Himmler on August 31st, 1942 personally witnessed the execution of 100 Jews by an Einsatz detachment in Minsk, ‘causing him to nearly faint.’ This account is repeated over and over again in books and magazines, despite the fact that as long ago as April, 1959, Bach-Zelewski admitted in court, ‘that he had made the allegations for the sake of expediency and his own survival.’ The court accepted his retraction. “In fact, it is known that on that date Himmler was in conference in his Field headquarters at Zhitomir in the Ukraine.”— Die Wehrmacht im Kampf , K. Vowinckel, Vol. 4, p. 275 OBERSTURMFUHRER KURT GERSTEIN Often quoted—with embellishment—this German officer’s death is shrouded in mystery after ‘he had confessed’. His claims appear regularly, even in school textbooks. Despite his rank, Gerstein was far from being a National Socialist and was apparently vehement on this point. Increasingly eccentric and convicted for sending eccentric mail through the post, he claimed to have infiltrated the S.S and told his French interrogator that no less than 40 million internees had been gassed. On April 12th, 1945, he revised this figure downwards to 25 million but even this figure—much larger than the world’s Jewish population—was too unreal for French propaganda purposes, and so the compromise figure of six million was agreed. Afterwards, Gerstein hanged himself in Cherche Midi Prison in Paris, although interestingly neither his body nor his grave have ever been found. DR. WILHELM HOETTL (alias WALTER HAGEN) This person’s evidence is often quoted but in fact he was an intelligence agent working for both the Americans and the Soviet Union. Close colleagues included two Jewish agents, Perger and Verber, based in Vienna, who acted as ‘U.S. Army officers during the Nuremberg trials’. “It should be emphasised straight away that there is not a single document in existence which proves that the Germans intended to, or carried out, the deliberate murder of Jews.”— Did Six Million Really Die? , Richard Harwood, Historical Review Press ALOIS HOELLRIEGEL After being tortured, the subsequent ‘confessions’ sent General Ernst Kaltenbrunner to the gallows. HERMAN GOERING Declared that the very first time he had heard of the extermination claims ‘was right here in Nuremberg.’ The Jewish writers, Poliakov, Reitlinger, Manvell and Frankl, all tried to implicate Goering but, Charles Bewley in his work, Herman Goering (Gottingen, 1956), shows that not the slightest evidence was found at Nuremberg to substantiate this charge. S.S. CAPTAIN DIETER WISLICENY The ‘evidence’ of S.S. Captain Dieter Wisliceny alleging Hitler’s extermination program is widely quoted and again embellished. An assistant in Adolf Eichmann’s office, the captain fell into the hands of Czech Communists and he was ‘interrogated’ at the Soviet-controlled Bratislava Prison during November 1946. Wisliceny was in fact tortured to “becoming a nervous wreck addicted to uncontrollable fits of sobbing for hours on end prior to execution.” S.S. GENERAL OTTO OHLENDORF This General was ‘persuaded to confess’ that 90,000 Jews had been killed under his command alone.’ In 1948, three years after the war’s end when Ohlendorf came to be tried, he retracted his statements claiming that they had been extracted under torture. He was executed in 1951 and of course, his ‘confessions’ still appear as evidence. There is a great deal written, illustrated and filmed about the alleged extermination program carried out by Hitler’s Germany. It is interesting to note that if such evidence was admissible only if proven, and not extracted under torture, there would be no evidence whatsoever that Hitler’s Germany had a policy of extermination, gassing or otherwise, against any racial grouping. Dr. E. Michael Jones, On “Anti-Semitism”: On October 16, 2004 President Bush signed into law the Global Anti-Semitism Review Act, which establishes a special department within the U.S. State Department to monitor global anti-Semitism, reporting annually to Congress. In its “Report on Global Anti-Semitism” and its “Global Anti- Semitism Report,” the U.S. State Department lists the following set of beliefs as anti-Semitic: 1) Any assertion “that the Jewish community controls government, the media, international business and the financial world” is anti-Semitic. 2) ”Strong anti-Israel sentiment” is anti-Semitic. 3) ”Virulent criticism” of Israel’s leaders, past or present, is anti-Semitic. According to the State Department, anti-Semitism occurs when a swastika is portrayed in a cartoon decrying the behavior of a past or present Zionist leader. Thus, a cartoon that includes a swastika to criticize Ariel Sharon’s brutal 2002 invasion of the West Bank, raining “hell-fire” missiles on hapless Palestinian men, women and children, is anti-Semitic. Similarly, when the word “Zionazi” is used to describe Sharon’s saturation bombing in Lebanon in 1982 (killing 17,500 innocent refugees), it is also “anti- Semitic.” 4) Criticism of the Jewish religion or its religious leaders or literature (especially the Talmud and Kabbalah) is anti-Semitic. 5) Criticism of the U.S. government and Congress for being under undue influence by the Jewish- Zionist community (including AIPAC) is anti-Semitic. 6) Criticism of the Jewish-Zionist community for promoting globalism (the “New World Order”) is anti-Semitic. 7) Blaming Jewish leaders and their followers for inciting the Roman crucifixion of Christ is anti- Semitic. 8) Diminishing the “six million” figure of Holocaust victims is anti-Semitic. 9) Calling Israel a “racist” state is anti-Semitic. 10) Asserting that there exists a “Zionist Conspiracy” is anti-Semitic. 11) Claiming that Jews and their leaders created the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia is anti-Semitic. 12) Making “derogatory statements about Jewish persons” is anti-Semitic. The State Department criteria has serious implications for anyone alive today. The most serious is that it turns many Jews, who have made many of the above claims in books and articles they have written, into anti-Semites. But the State Departmen’s definitions have serious historical implications as well. If we take numbers 4 and 7 for example, it seems clear that not just ordinary Catholics but Catholic popes and saints were guilty of anti-Semitism, according to the State Department’s criteria. Numerous popes beginning with Pope Gregory IX in 1238 have condemned the Talmud as a blasphemous assault on the person of Christ and the Christian faith and have urged Christians to confiscate and burn it. Concerning #7, St. Peter, the first pope claimed in the Acts of the Apostles that the Jews were responsible for the death of Christ. Even Nostrae Aetate , the declaration of Vatican II on the Jews which ushered in an era of good feeling and “ecumenism” claimed that some Jews were responsible for Christ’s death. By their promiscuous use of the term anti-Semitism Rickman and his cohorts in the State Department have turned traditional Catholic teaching into a hate crime. (From "The Conversion of the Revolutionary Jew" published in the October 2006 issue of Culture Wars magazine, also at culture wars.com) Dr. E. Michael Jones, On Jews and Pornography, From The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History , p. 1055-56 [After reading this excerpt, the reader may more easily connect the dots and see why powerful Jewish elites would militantly promote lies relating to Jewish suffering during WWII. For an even clearer picture read the whole book. It is a tour de force . Several chapters are available at archive.org] The connection between Jews and pornography is like the connection between Jews and Bolshevism. Both are forms of revolutionary activity, ultimately traceable to Jewish concepts that have been secularized. Jews become involved in pornography for reasons similar to why they become involved in Communism, which is to say, not just because they happened to be Jews but because being Jewish as they and Sabbatai Zevi and Wilhelm Reich defined it found logical expression in producing pornography as a form of cultural warfare through moral subversion . 'Jews who came to America,' Elliott Abrams writes, 'were usually. . . not the most devout people in their communities' anyway. The decline in faith and morals, however, did not mean that they stopped defining themselves as Jews. Socialism and sexual liberation simply filled up the religious vessels from which the Torah had evaporated. ...The Israelis have recently shown themselves well-versed in what one could call the military use of pornography. At 4:30 PM on March 30, 2002, Israeli military forces took over Palestinian TV stations when they occupied Ramallah in the West Bank, immediately shutting them down. What followed was a little more unusual. Shortly after occupying the Al-Watan TV station, the Israeli forces began broadcasting pornography over its transmitter. Eventually, according to a report from The Advertiser , an Australian newspaper, the Israelis expanded their cultural offensive against the Palestinian people by broadcasting pornography over two other Palestinian stations, the Ammwaj and Al-Sharaq channels. ... The simple fact of the matter is that this incident simply cannot be explained according to the principles available in contemporary American culture. In order to understand the disparity between the official explanation of pornography and what might be termed its military use, we have to go back to the ancients. The story of Samson and Delilah might be a good place to start. Israel was invincible militarily then too—at least that part hasn't changed—so the Philistines decided that they had to get at the Israelite leader by other than military means. Unable to defeat him in battle, they decided to seduce him sexually. Once Samson succumbed to Delilah's wiles, he lost his power, and Israel lost its leader. They could find him then not on the field of battle, but rather to use Milton's phrase 'eyeless in Gaza, grinding at the mill with slaves.' The story of the Palestinian TV stations broadcasting pornography has a curiously Biblical ring to it. Having learned their lesson, the Israelis decided to turn the tables on their opponents, because they knew that a blind opponent is no opponent at all, and because they knew—as the ancient Greeks knew—that lust makes a man blind. St. Thomas Aquinas, giving voice to that same tradition over a millennium later said that lust 'darkens the mind.' Suddenly, Israel's use of pornography in their battle against the Palestinians isn't so inexplicable anymore because a blind opponent is a weak opponent. A blind opponent is no opponent at all. Jewish chutzpah was displayed no better than when Al Goldstein, the Jewish publisher of Screw , was asked by Luke Ford why so many Jews were engaged in trafficking porn. Goldstein’s answer was: “The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. We don’t believe in authoritarianism.” But there is a more practical reason Jews dominate pornography, for it is a means to revolution. As even Luke Ford admits: “‘Why does porn attract so many non-Jewish Jews?’ Because ‘even when Jews live in a society that welcomes them instead of harassing them, many Jews hate the majority culture.’ Pornography weakens the majority culture by moral subversion. Jews often lead in the application of new technology. That meant using high resolution photography, the VCR, and the Internet to deliver pornography just as it meant dynamite, forgery, and smuggling to bring down the Czar in Russia.” ( The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History , called by Dr. Robert Sungenis "one of the most important books ever written," can be purchased at culturewars.com). “The American people and our faithful allies put their trust in me. And now you can trust President Obama — even though he is a democrat (hee hee!). And I just know God continues to inspire us to spread freedom and democracy around the world with our armed forces. Sometimes you have to break a few eggs to make a tasty omelet (hee hee). Besides, what’s a few million Palestinians and Muslims when you’re talking about making it possible for Israel to re-establish the great Kingdom it had under King David and Solomon? You see, both President Obama and I believe in the Bible, and we believe in Israel, and we believe in all our generous Zionist friends, and uh, well, let’s just keep on bombin’ and trust in the Lord! By doing this we can also help to atone for the Holocaust, for which all of us non-Jews are responsible.” “I’m sorry, Holy Father, I can’t seem to hear you. Did you say something about peace? Can you speak louder? Maybe we have a bad connection.” “Welcome to Wal-Mart! As you can see, we’re having a special Pre-World War III sale between now and when our military and our wonderful Israeli friends begin annihilating Iran — and anyone else they and the Masters of the Universe want to help make peaceful and democratic nations (hee hee!). And don‘t miss our new “Holocaust Memorabilia” section taking up all of aisle 6!” The “Holocaust” is like a pet crocodile, only it’s one that keeps growing and never dies a natural death. You must constantly feed it more and more so that it will not eat you too - or at least will eat you last . But you know it will eventually eat you too - unless you kill it first. Related Information at these Websites and their Links See fpp.co.uk , David Irving’s website with many free books: Banged Up is a good one to begin with; also the chapter, "Final Solution" in his book Nurenberg; and The Morgenthau Plan , outlining the Jewish- inspired plan to murder 50 million Germans by execution, famine, and disease after World War II. The diabolical Plan was modified by non-Jews but still 16 million Germans perished , a startling fact that very few people even know about, because the "Masters of Discourse" don't want us to know about it! This was a true holocaust that makes Jewish exaggerations about their own sufferings seem blasphemous by comparison. See also www.vho.org , www.tadp.org , holocaust-history.org , revisionists.com , savethemales.ca , conspiracyPenPal.com , wikileaks.com , zionistwatch.wordpress.com , geocities.com , jewsnotzionists.org , jewishracism.com , ziopedia.org . realhistoryarchives.com , conspiracyplanet.com , sweetliberty.org , atrocities.net , johnpilger.com , jewsagainstzionism.com , jewwatch.com , exposingisraeliapartheid.com , jewsnotzionists.org , www.truthtellers.org , israelshamir.net , culturewars.com . If any of these sites are censored by our oppressors, go to www.anonymizer.com . See also http://karinfriedemann.blogspot.com/2009/02/emotional-abuse-of-israel-advocacy.html and http://karinfriedemann.blogspot.com/2009/01/victims-of-holocaust-really.html. And for truth in the news rather than New World Order/Jewish propaganda subscribe to e-newsletters such as shamireaders- email@example.com and the Global Research e-newsletter at www.globalresearch.ca . Some of the books mentioned above can be found at archive.org.