close

Вход

Забыли?

вход по аккаунту

?

Blank

код для вставкиСкачать
Vladimir Khvalei
The Radisson Royal Hotel Moscow
September 27, 2013
“Бейкер и Макензи - Си-Ай-Эс, Лимитед” входит в состав Baker & McKenzie International, организации, созданной в форме швейцарского объединения (Swiss Verein),
состоящего из юридических фирм - участников объединения в разных странах мира. В соответствии с общепринятой терминологией, используемой компаниями в
сфере профессиональных услуг, термин “партнер” означает лицо, имеющее статус партнера в такой юридической фирме или занимающее аналогичную должность.
Термин “офис” или “представительство” означает, соответственно, офис такой юридической фирмы.
© 2013 Бейкер и Макензи – Си-Ай-Эс, Лимитед
2010 International Arbitration Survey:
CHOICES IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION
Preferred seats of arbitration
London 30%
Geneva 9%
Paris 7%
Tokyo 7%
Singapore 7%
New York 6%
Other 34%
© 2013 Бейкер и Макензи – Си-Ай-Эс, Лимитед
2
2012 ICC Court Statistical Report:
Places of arbitration: top ten cities selected in 2012
City
Number of cases
Paris
100
London
71
Geneva
62
Zurich
48
Singapore
36
New York
22
Vienna
13
Mexico
12
Frankfurt/M
10
Hong Kong
10
Moscow
0
© 2013 Бейкер и Макензи – Си-Ай-Эс, Лимитед
ICC Court Statistical Report:
© 2013 Бейкер и Макензи – Си-Ай-Эс, Лимитед
4
RUSSIA AS PLACE FOR ARBITRATION
ICC Russia Survey
© 2013 Бейкер и Макензи – Си-Ай-Эс, Лимитед
http://www.iccwbo.ru/news/0/305/
5
ICC Russia Survey “RUSSIA AS PLACE FOR ARBITRATION”
Please indicate your preferences with regard to the cities listed below if
negotiating the place for arbitration
foreign respondents
Russian respondents
Paris (1)
3.71
Paris (1)
Stockholm (2)
3.70
Vienna (2)
4.14
4.14
4.39
London (3)
3.59
London (3)
Moscow (4)
3.55
Stockholm (4)
3.92
Geneva (5)
3.88
3.30
Geneva (5)
Singapore (6)
3.23
Vienna (6)
2.95
St. Petersburg (7)
2.54
New York (8)
2.08
Hong Kong (10)
1.98
Singapore (11)
0
1
2
Moscow (7)
3.21
New York (8)
3.20
Dubai (9)
2.26
Dubai (9)
3.77
3
4
5
3.00
Hong Kong (10)
2.88
St. Petersburg (11)
2.85
0
1
2
3
4
5
2010 International Arbitration Survey:
CHOICES IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION
Top influences on the choice of the law governing the substance of the
dispute
© 2013 Бейкер и Макензи – Си-Ай-Эс, Лимитед
7
ICC Russia Survey “RUSSIA AS PLACE FOR ARBITRATION”
Your choice of Russia as the place for arbitration is influenced positively by:
foreign respondents
Russian respondents
19
cultural f acilities (theaters, museums)
av ailability of qualif ied lawy ers specializing in
arbitration – locally
31
18
y our lev el of the Russian language knowledge
30
y our lev el of the Russian language knowledge
av ailability of qualif ied lawy ers specializing in
arbitration – locally
21
transport inf rastructure/ connections
av ailability of qualif ied case administration personnel,
interpreters, etc.
14
attitude to f oreigners, religious and political tolerance
9
av ailability of qualif ied case administration personnel,
interpreters, etc.
9
transport inf rastructure/ connections
9
20
cultural f acilities (theaters, museums)
17
local inf rastructure in general
17
16
costs (accommodation, premises rental, etc.)
attitude to f oreigners, religious and political tolerance
15
remoteness f rom y our own location
15
8
tax and banking legislation
6
v isa regime
0
5
local inf rastructure in general
8
remoteness f rom y our own location
8
6
tax and banking legislation
1
v isa regime
1
0
crime rate
5
crime rate
8
costs (accommodation, premises rental, etc.)
14
political stability
political stability
10
15
20
25
30
35
0
5
10
15
20
25
ICC Russia Survey “RUSSIA AS PLACE FOR ARBITRATION”
Your choice of Russia as the place for arbitration is influenced negatively by:
Russian respondents
foreign respondents
21
v isa regime
20
political stability
18
crime rate
av ailability of qualif ied case administration personnel,
interpreters, etc.
18
transport inf rastructure/ connections
17
14
tax and banking legislation
13
costs (accommodation, premises rental, etc.)
local inf rastructure in general
15
remoteness f rom y our own location
15
av ailability of qualif ied case administration personnel,
interpreters, etc.
remoteness f rom y our own location
8
attitude to f oreigners, religious and political tolerance
6
13
12
av ailability of qualif ied lawy ers specializing in
arbitration – locally
8
8
y our lev el of the Russian language knowledge
2
y our lev el of the Russian language knowledge
cultural f acilities (theaters, museums)
2
cultural f acilities (theaters, museums)
5
14
political stability
7
0
16
15
8
attitude to f oreigners, religious and political tolerance
18
tax and banking legislation
transport inf rastructure/ connections
av ailability of qualif ied lawy ers specializing in
arbitration – locally
19
costs (accommodation, premises rental, etc.)
local inf rastructure in general
crime rate
22
v isa regime
10
15
20
25
1
0
5
10
15
20
25
ICC Russia Survey “RUSSIA AS PLACE FOR ARBITRATION”
In what situations would you agree to submit a dispute to international
arbitration in Russia?
Russian respondents
foreign respondents
If Russian law is the gov erning law in
that dispute
If rejection to choose Russia is a dealbreaker
If rejection to choose Russia is a dealbreaker
If Russian law is the gov erning law in that
dispute
If the amount in controv ersy is not
signif icant
If this is an arbitration under the rules of a
f oreign arbitral institution
If this is an arbitration under the rules of
a f oreign arbitral institution
If the amount in controv ersy is not
signif icant
On all occasions
No answer
No answer
On all occasions
Nev er
Nev er
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
•
proposals for improvement of legislation
•
development of recommended standards for arbitration
institutions
•
training programs for arbitrators
•
RAA information resource
•
programs for the support of young professionals in
arbitration field (РАА 40)
•
administering disputes under the UNCITRAL arbitration
rules
•
On-line arbitration
11
12
1
A&T Lawyers
26
MENA Chambers sprl
2
AKP Consulting
27
Monastyrsky, Zyuba and Stepanov & Partners
3
Allen & Overy
28
Morgan Lewis International LLC
4
ALRUD
29
Moris Group
5
Astapov & Partners
30
MOTIEKA & AUDZEVICIUS
6
Baker & McKenzie
31
Muranov, Chernyakov & Partners
7
Bartolius
32
Nektorov, Saveliev & Partners
8
BEITEN BURGHARDT
33
Norton Rose Fulbright (Central Europe) LLP
9
Clifford Chance CIS Ltd
34
Ost Legal
10
Debevoise & Plimpton
35
Pepelyaev Group
11
Dechert Russia
36
Prime Advice
12
Engarde
37
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
13
FBK Pravo
38
RBL Law Firm
14
Freshfields Bruckhaus
39
Revera Consulting Group
15
Hogan Lovells CIS
40
Sabev & Partners
16
Injurservice
41
Sayenko, Kharenko
17
IPEG
42
SG Global Advice L.L.P
18
Kachkin & Partners
43
Squire Sanders
19
Kalikova Associates
44
Stephenson & Harwood LLP
20
Khrenov & partners
45
Sysuev, Bondar & Khraputski
21
Knyazev & Partners
46
Vegas-Lex
22
Koblev & Partners
47
Westside Advisors
23
Korelsky, Itschuk, Astafiev and Partners
48
White & Case
24
Lidings
49
Yakovlev & Partners
25
Makarov Legal Bureau
50
Yukov & Partners
13
14
Документ
Категория
Искусство, дизайн
Просмотров
6
Размер файла
5 602 Кб
Теги
1/--страниц
Пожаловаться на содержимое документа