close

Вход

Забыли?

вход по аккаунту

?

Impaired delayed hypersensitivity in systemic lupus erythematosus.

код для вставкиСкачать
Impaired Delayed Hypersensitivity in Systemic Lupus
Erythematosus
David A. Horwitz
When identical twin sisters discordant for systemic lupus erythematosus
(SLE) were immunized with keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) the affected
twin failed to develop delayed hypersensitivity and her lymphocytes failed
to proliferate in response to KLH in vitro, unlike her normal sister. Subsequently, recently diagnosed SLE patients were skin tested with common
antigens and 12 of 14 did not develop a positive skin reaction, in contrast
to most patients with tuberculosis, who showed at least one positive response. There was no difference, however, in the leukocyte response to
phytohemagglutinin between the two groups. These findings raised the
question of a selective defect in cellular immunity in patients with SLE.
Although immune complexes are believed to
trigger vascular inflammatory lesions in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (l), the primary events which lead to the formation of
these pathogenetic complexes are unknown.
Patients with this disease show increased
immunoglobulin metabolism. They characteristically demonstrate numerous autoantibodies
(2), show increased titers of antibodies to a
number of viruses (3) and immunoglobulin
turnover studies indicate increased synthesis of
IgG (4). In contrast, cellular immunity in SLE
patients is poorly understood. We have had the
unique opportunity to study the immune response of identical twin sisters discordant for
SLE. After immunization with keyhole limpet
_____
From the Division of Rheumatic Diseases, Department
of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia School of
Medicine, Charlottesville. Virginia 22901.
DAVID A. HORWITZ, MD. Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine, university of Virginia School of Medicine,
Charlottesville, Virginia. T h e author is a recipient of a
postdoctoral fellowship from the Arthritis Foundation.
This work was supported in part by United States Public
Health Service institutional grants RR05431-10, RR30405 and NSF institutional grant GU 3784.
Reprint requests should be addressed to: Dr. David A.
Horwitz.
Submitted for publication Sept 23, 1971; accepted Dec
29, 1971.
hemocyanin (KLH) the affected twin failed to
demonstrate delayed and in vitro hypersensitivity to this antigen when compared with her
normal sister, although both twins demonstrated a normal antibody response. Subsequently, other patients with S L E of recent
onset were also studied. T h e purpose of this
communication is to report impaired hypersensitivity in S L E and the possible implications
of this finding.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Antigens. In these studies the following antigens were
used: candida (Hollister Stier, Yeadon, Pennsylvania), trichophyton (Hollister Stier), streptokinase-streptodornase
(SK-SD) (Varidase, Lederle, Pearl River, New York),
mumps (Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, Indiana) and tuberculin
[purified protein derivative (PPD)] (Park Davis, Detroit,
Michigan). Preservative-free P P D (Lot 974775) for tissue
culture studies was generously supplied by D r H B Devlin
(Parke Davis).
Keyhole limpet hernocyanin was obtained as an ammonium sulfate precipitate from the Pacific Biomarine Supply
Company, Venice, California. This material was prepared
essentially in the associated form by a method modified
from Campbell and co-workers (5).
Patients. At age 51 one of monozygotic twin sisters
developed arthralgias, nephrotic syndrome, positive LE
preps and decreased complement. At age 57, 1%years after
Arthritis and Rheumatism, Vol. 15, No. 4 (July-August 1972)
353
HORWITZ
her disease had stabilized and previous steroid therapy had
been discontinued, both twins were immunized subcutaneously with 2 mg of KLH. T o date, the other twin sister remains healthy and without antinuclear antibodies. The
white blood count and differential of each were normal at
the time of these studies. Detailed case reports of the twins
will appear elsewhere (6).
Other patients with SLE included 13 females and 1
male, age range 14-69 (median 33). T h e diagnosis was established by the presence of signs and symptoms consistent
with that disease, combined with the presence of antinuclear
antibodies demonstrated by the immunofluorescence technic
using mouse liver as nuclear substrate. Twelve manifested
hypergammaglobulinemia ( > 2 g% gammaglobulin), and
none were azotemic. Nine of these patients were studied
within 3 months after the onset of their presenting complaint. Age- and sex-matched patients with active tuberculosis, hospitalized at the Blue Ridge Sanitarium, served as
controls.
Skin Tests. Eleven of 14 SLE patients were skin-tested
prior to prednisone therapy and 3 were receiving 10 mg or
less at the time they were studied. All patients rereived .1
ml intradermal injections of the following antigens: candida
1 :30, trichophyton 1:30, SK-SD 1:40. T h e twins received
KLH 10 pg. Millimeters of erythema and induration were
recorded at 5, 24 and 48 hours. Early (5 hour) reactions
were clearly distinguished from late (48 hour) reactions.
were added and incubated for 6 days. Tritiated thymidine
1 pCi/ml, specific activity 67 Ci/mM, was added 2 hours
prior to termination and the incorporation of isotope
measured by scintillation spectrometry (7). Serum antibody titers to KLH were determined by Dr. John S.
Davis IV using the tanned red cell hernagglutination
technic (8).
Statistical Analysis. Lymphocyte counts were determined from a hemocytometer leukocyte count, 200 cell
differential count and the results from patients with SLE
and tuberculosis compared with the Fisher exact prohabilit y test. T h e Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test (9) was used to
analyze the radioisotopic data obtained.
RESULTS
Prior to immunization neither twin demonstrated hemagglutinating antibody to K L H and
their leukocytes showed no response to K L H as
measured by the incorporation of 3Hthymidine. Twenty-eight days after immunization, the healthy sister demonstrated a typical
delayed cutaneous response as well as a rise in
antibody titer to KLH. Although antibody to
In Vitro Studies. Control and stimulated leukocyte
cultures containing 5 x lo6 washed blood leukocytes were
prepared in triplicate using previously described technics (7). Fifteen percent heat-inactivated type AB human
serum obtained from a healthy donor was used in all cultures rather than autologous plasma. Phytohemagglutinin
M (Difco, Detroit, Michigan) . I ml was added where indicated and the cultures incubated for 3 and 4 days to determine the peak response of each patient. T o other cultures,
preservative-free P P D 10 pmoles/ml and KLH 15 pg/ml
NON- SLE
P
Table 1. Comparison of Delayed Hypersensitivity
and Serum Antibody Response to KLH 28 Days
After Immunization
3
Monozygotic twins
Induration 48 hours
after 10 pg KLH
Hemagglutinating
anti body
354
SLE
Non-SLE
None
10 x 1 0 m m
1:64
1:64
4
5
6
Day of Incubation
Fig 1. Kinetics of 3H-thymidine incorporation by
the twins’ mononuclear leukocytes in resDonse to
KLH 28 days postimmunization.
and
lines
indicate counts per minute of stimulated and control cultures of normal sister. -- and ... indicate
counts per minute of twin sister. Error bars indicate
the range of triplicate cultures.
-
---
Arthritis and Rheumatism, Vol. 15, No. 4 (July-August 1972)
DELAYED HYPERSENSITIVITY IN SLE
K L H was also found in the serum of the sister
with SLE, this individual failed to develop a
cutaneous response to this antigen (Table 1).
At this time, the healthy sister’s leukocytes
showed a strong proliferative response to K L H
in contrast to her sister. Figure 1 indicates the
incorporation of 3H-thymidine by each sister’s
leukocytes on successive days in culture. T h e
peak response observed occurred on Day 6. In
these studies, in vitro hypersensitivity correlated with delayed hypersensitivity rather than
the humoral antibody response to KLH.
T h e twins were skin tested with the three test
antigens, as well as mumps and tuberculin. T h e
affected twin failed to show a delayed response
to any antigen while her sister responded to
SK-SD and trichophyton. These studies demonstrate impaired delayed hypersensitivity in
the twin with S L E when compared with her
healthy sister.
Figure 2 illustrates the leukocyte response to
phytohemagglutinin (PHA) on successive days
in culture. Both twins’ leukocytes showed a
proliferative response to PHA. However, the
peak response of the affected twin was approximately 20% less than her normal sister
and appeared 1 day later.
Delayed cutaneous reactivity to antigens
in SLE and tuberculosis. T h e immune defect described in the twin with S L E may have
been present at the onset of her disease or may
be a late manifestation of a chronic disease. In
an attempt to clarify this issue, a group of patients with S L E of recent onset were skin-tested
and their reactivity to common antigens compared with age and sex-matched controls with
tuberculosis. Figure 3 indicates that all normal
individuals manifested s t r o n g delayed skin
reactions to SK-SD. Each normal usually responded to either candida or trichophyton.
Skin reactivity of the group with tuberculosis
was only slightly less than the normal individuals. After intradermal SK-SD, 88% of
the patients with tuberculosis showed 48-hour
skin reactions similar to the controls. In sharp
contrast to these results, 12 of the 14 patients
with S L E did not show a typical delayed response to any of the antigens tested. T h e 2 patients with S L E showing more than 10 mm of
induration to SK-SD were asymptomatic at
the time they were tested. One of these also
reacted to candida.
Figure 4 shows that 7 of 8 patients with S L E
with less than 1200 lymphocytes per cubic millimeter failed to show a positive skin test.
However, 5 of 6 nonlymphopenic patients were
also anergic, which suggests that other factors
besides reduced numbers of lymphocytes contribute to impaired cutaneous reactivity in
SLE.
~.
2
3
4
5
Day of lncu bation
Fig 2. Kinetics of 3H-thymidine incorporation by
the twins’ mononuclear leukocytes in response to
PHA. Control cultures yielded less than 100 counts/
m i n per million mononuclear leukocytes.
Mononuclear leukocyte response to
PHA in SLE and tuberculosis. Since P H A
stimulates predominantly thymus-derived
cells (10) and these cells are required in delayed
hypersensitivity (1 l ) , blood leukocytes from
patients with S L E were cultured with P H A and
Arthritis and Rheumatism, Vol. 15, No. 4 (July-August 1972)
355
HORWITZ
a
a
0
a
0
a
i
a
a
a
a
0
a
a
0
0
a
a
aim
0
a
Candido SK-SD
Normal
Trich
a
a
a
a
0:
0
8
a
a
a
Candida SK-Sd
Trich
SLE
-
:
:r,.I,t
Candida SK-SD
Trich
Tuberculosis
Day of Incubation
Fig 3. Delayed hypersensitivity t o candida. streptokinase-streptodornase and trichophyton in SLE and matched controls with. tuberculosis. Each point indicates the mean of
two diameters measured perpendicular to each other.
356
Arthritis and Rheumatism,Vol. 15,No. 4 (July-August 1972)
DELAYED HYPERSENSITIVITY IN SLE
(4.1)
q
3.0
r
2.5
-
0
E
a
.c?;: 2.0 0
5
2
1.5
-
8
t-
00
Y
g
-
8
3
1.0
-
U
0
L
I
+&
a
0
0.5
-
00
0
00
1
SLE
TUBERCULOSIS
Fig 4. Peripheral blood lymphocyte counts of
patients with SLE an.d tuberculosis. Bar indicates
median values (P = 0.05). Closed circles indicate
patients with at least one positive skin test. Open
circles indicate nonresponders.
their peak response compared with matched
patients with tuberculosis. All cultures contained serum obtained from a single source,
since inhibitors to PHA may occur in the serum
of patients with many diseases (12). Figure 5
indicates that, unlike the skin test response,
there was no difference in the uptake of 3Hthymidine between the two groups (P<O.1).
DISCUSSION
T h e present studies suggest a dissociation
between humoral and cellular immunity in
SLE. T h e finding of defective delayed hypersensitivity in one monozygotic twin with
SLE was confirmed by further studies involving
a group of recently diagnosed patients with
SLE. T h e present results parallel the very recent observations of Bitter (13) and Abe and
Homma (1 4) who reported depressed delayed
hypersensitivity to all antigens they tested.
Previously, Block and co-workers skin tested
patients with SLE with five ubiquitous antigens
and noted significant hyporeactivity only to tu-
SLE
TUBERCULOSIS
Fig 5. 3H-thymidine incorporation by mononuclear leukocytes in response t o PHA. Leukocytes
were incubated with PHA 3 and 4 days and the peak
response of patients with SLE and matched controls compared. The horizontal bars indicate
median values ( P > 0.1).
berculin (15). Many of their reported skin
reactions were not typical of delayed responses
peaking at 24 rather than 48 hours. Five-hour
responses were not reported.
T h e mononuclear infiltrate of delayed hypersensitivity results from 1) antigen-stimulated,
thymus-derived lymphocytes that produce
migration inhibitory factors and other lymphokines which 2) results in the accumulation
activation of marrow-derived cells which comprise the majority of cells found in the intradermal lesion (11, 16). In addition, macrophages appear to be necessary for lymphocytes
to respond to antigen (17). Since mononuclear
leukocytes are required for the expression of
this reaction, can the observed cutaneous hyporeactivity be a manifestation of reduced blood
leukocytes? Although lymphopenia was frequently observed in these studies, nonlymphopenic patients also manifested anergy.
Arthritis and Rheumatism,Vol. 15, No. 4 (July-August 1972)
357
HORWITZ
Other studies from this laboratory indicate that
patients with SLE have normal numbers of
circulating mononuclear phagocytes (18). Apparently other factors besides decreased leukocyte counts must be implicated.
Defective delayed hypersensitivity in diseases
such as Sjogren’s syndrome, sarcoidosis, leprosy
or Hodgkin’s disease is correlated with poor
lymphocyte responsiveness to P H A (1 9-22).
T h e failure to find decreased incorporation of
3H-thymidine by PHA-stimulated lymphocytes
in patients with SLE and anergy was surprising.
Unlike the twin studies, the kinetics of the
P H A response in these patients was not determined. A mild abnormality might not have been
detected. T h e present findings, however, corroborate the results of Patrucco, Rothfield and
Hirschhorn who reported normal leukocyte
transformation following P H A stimulation in
SLE (23). Delbarre and colleagues reported
poor PHA-induced lymphocyte transformation
in patients with active SLE. These results are
difficult to interpret since autologous plasma
was used in many cell cultures (24). Unpublished studies from this laboratory indicate that
SLE plasma will inhibit the proliferative response of normal lymphocytes to PHA.
T h e observation that the SLE twin’s lymphocytes responded to PHA, not antigen, is of
interest. Since P H A stimulates predominantly
thymus-derived cells (10), these findings suggest that these cells are present but unresponsive. T w o instances of lymphocyte malfunction
in the presence of normal P H A responsiveness
have been reported. Greaves, Torrigiani and
Roitt observed that antibodies to immunoglobulin light chain determinants inhibited the
mixed lymphocyte reaction probably by blocking the lymphocyte surface receptor site for antigen (25). Smithwick and Berkovich reported
that measles virus suppressed the lymphocyte to
tuberculin (26). In each of these studies these
factors, either external or internal to the lymphocyte, did not interfere with the stimulatory
effect of PHA.
Finally, a dissociation between humoral and
358
cellular immunity has been reported in the
genetically transmitted “mouse lupus,” the
New Zealand mouse disease. These mice demonstrate a hyperactive antibody response to a
number of antigens, but their lymphocytes show
an impaired ability to mount a cell-mediated
response (27). It is possible that a defect in cellular immunity may in some way be related to
autoantibody formation and increased immunoglobulin metabolism. In some strains of mice
neonatal thymectomy induced the appearance
of autoantibodies (28), and in one strain thymectomy was followed by the appearance of an
immune complex glomerulonephritis similar
pathologically to the nephritis of SLE (29). It
is possible that the cellular defect in delayed
hypersensitivity described in these experiments
reflects a more fundamental loss of cellular control of the antibody response which eventually
leads to the autoimmune manifestations of SLE.
Further studies are in order to pinpoint the
cellular defect in SLE.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
T h e author wishes to thank Dr. ,John S. Davis IV
for the antibody determinations included in this study, Mrs.
Martha Ann Garrett for expert technical assistance and Dr.
Forrest Pitts, Director of the Blue Ridge Sanitarium,
Charlottesville, for making patients available for study. The
clinical studies in this report have been approved by the
Human Experimentation Committee of the University of
Virginia.
REFERENCES
1. Koffler U, Schur PH, Kunkel HG: Immunological studies concerning the nephritis of systemic lupus erythematosus.J Exp Med 126:607624,1967
2. Dubois EL: Lupus Erythematosus. New York,
McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1966, pp 85-92
3. Hollinger FB, Sharp JT, Lidsky MD, et al:
Antibodies to viral antigens in systemic lupus
erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 14:l-11, 1971
4. Levy J , Barnett EV, MacDonald NS, et al: Altered immunoglobulin metabolism in systemic
lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. J
Clin Invest 49:708-715,1970
5. Campbell DH, Garvey JS, Cremer NE, et al:
Arthritis and Rheumatism, Vol. 15, No. 4 (July-August1972)
DELAYED HYPERSENSITIVITY IN SLE
Methods in Immunology. New York, T h e Benjamin Company, Inc., 1964, pp 69-71
6. Brunner C M , Horwitz DA, Shann M K , et al:
Unpublished data
7. Horwitz DA, Stastny P, Ziff M : Circulating
deoxyribonucleic acid-synthesizing mononuclear
leukocytes. 1. Increased numbers of proliferating
mononuclear leukocytes in inflammatory
disease. J Lab Clin Med 76:391-402, 1970
8. Stavitsky AB: Micromethods for the study of
proteins and antibodies. I. Procedure and general
applications of hemagglutination and hemagglutination-inhibition reactions with tannic acid
and protein-treated red blood cells. J Immunol
72~360-367, 1954
9. Wilcoxon F : Individual comparisons by ranking
methods. Biometrics 1 :80-83, 1945
10. Davies AJS, Festenstein H, Leuchars E, et al: A
thymic origin for some peripheral blood lymphocytes. Lancet 1:183-184,1968
11. Roitt IM, Greaves M F , Torrigiani G , et al:
Cellular basis of immunological responses.
Lancet 1 :367-37 1, 1969
12. Gatti RA: Serum inhibitors of lymphocyte responses. Lancet 1 : 1351, 197 1
13. Bitter T: Systemic lupus erythematosus: antinuclear serology and cell mediated immunity in
the light of clinico-hematologic diagnostic
criteria. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 101: 181,
1971
14. Abe T , Homma M: Immunological reactivity in
patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Acta Rheumatol Scand 17:35-46, 1971
1.5. Block SR, Gibbs CG, Stevens MB, et al: Delayed hypersensitivity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 27:311-318, 1968
16. David .JR: Lymphocytic factors in cellular hypersensitivity. Hosp Pract 4:79-94, 197 1
17. H e r s h E M a n d H a r r i s J E : Macrophagelymphocyte interaction in the antigen-induced
blastogenic response of human peripheral blood
leukocytes. .J Immunol 100:1184-1194, 1968
18. Horwitz, DA: T h e development of macrophages
from large mononuclear cells in the blood of pa-
tients with inflammatory disease. J Clin Invest
51~760-768, 1971
19. Leventhal BG, Waldorf’DS, Talal N : Impaired
lymphocyte transformation and delayed hypersensitivity in Sjogren’s syndrome. .J Clin Invest 46:1338-1345, 1967
20. Hirschhorn K, Schreibman RR, Bach FH, et al:
In vitro studies of lymphocytes from patients
with sarcoidosis and lymphoproliferative
diseases. Lancet 2:842-843, 1964
21. Dierks RE, Shepard CC: Effect of phytohemagglutinin and various mycobacterial antigens
on lymphocyte cultures from leprosy patients.
Proc SOCExp Biol Med 127:391-395, 1968
22. Hersh E M , Oppenheim JJ: Impaired in vitro
lymphocyte transformation in Hodgkin’s
disease. N Engl J Med 273:1006-1012, 1965
23. Patrucco A, Rothfield NF, Hirschhorn K : T h e
response of cultured lymphocytes from patients
with systemic lupus erythematosus to DNA. Arthritis Rheum 10:32-36,1967
24. Delbarre F, Pompidou A, Kahan A, et al: Study
of blood lymphocytes during systemic lupus erythematosus. Pathol Biol 19:379-387, 1971
25. Greaves M F , Torriginai G , and Roitt I M : Inhibition of human mixed lymphocyte reaction hy
antibodies to immunoglobulin light chain determinants. Clin Exp Immunol 9:313-328,
1971
26. Smithwick E M and Berkovich S: In vitro suppression of the lymphocyte response to tuberculin by live measles virus. Proc SOC Exp Biol
Med 123:276-278,1966
27. Talal N: Immunologic and viral factors in the
pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus.
Arthritis Rheum 13:887-894, 1970
28. Teague PO and Friou G J : Antinuclear antibodies in mice. 11. Transmission with spleen
cells: Inhibition or prevention with thymus o r
spleen cells. Immunology 17:665-675, 1969
29. Teague PO, Yunis EJ, Rodey G, et al: Autoimmune phenomena and renal disease in mice:
Role of thymectomy, aging, and involution of
immunologic capacity. Lab Invest 22: 12 1-130,
1970
Arthritis and Rheumatism, Vol. 15, No. 4 (July-August 1972)
359
Документ
Категория
Без категории
Просмотров
0
Размер файла
417 Кб
Теги
lupus, impaired, delayed, systemic, erythematosus, hypersensitivity
1/--страниц
Пожаловаться на содержимое документа