Virtual Assessment of the Endocranial Morphology of the Early Modern European Fossil Calvaria From Cioclovina Romania.код для вставкиСкачать
THE ANATOMICAL RECORD 294:1083–1092 (2011) Virtual Assessment of the Endocranial Morphology of the Early Modern European Fossil Calvaria From Cioclovina, Romania ELENA F. KRANIOTI,1 RALPH HOLLOWAY,2 SASCHA SENCK,3 TUDOR CIPRUT,4 DAN GRIGORESCU,5 AND KATERINA HARVATI6* 1 Forensic Anthropology, School of History, Classics and Archaeology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland 2 Department of Anthropology, Columbia University, New York, New York 3 Department of Anthropology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria 4 Radiology Department, Centrul De Sanatate Pro-Life SRL, Bucharest, Romania 5 Department of Paleontology, University of Bucharest, Romania 6 Paleoanthropology, Department of Early Prehistory and Quaternary Ecology and Senckenberg Center for Human Evolution and Paleoecology, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Rümelinstrasse 23, Tübingen 72070, Germany ABSTRACT Endocasts provide evidence on size and shape characteristics, blood supply trajectories, and neurological features of the brain, allowing comparative analyses of fossil hominins crucial to our understanding of human brain evolution. Here, we assess the morphological features of the virtual endocast of the Cioclovina Upper Paleolithic calvarium, one of the earliest reliably dated European modern human fossils. Our study was conducted on a computed tomography (CT) scan of the original specimen. The endocranial proﬁle was approximated via a semiautomatic segmentation of the CT data. Virtual reconstructions of the endocast were used for assessing the morphological features of the endocranium and for the estimation of the endocranial volume. Cioclovina exhibits a clockwise torque with a small anterior extension of the left frontal lobe over the right one and a protrusion of the right occipital lobe over the left, most likely due to the superior sagittal sinus coursing over the occipital pole. There is an obvious right predominance of the posterior drainage system. Interestingly, the area of the frontal sinus is occupied by dense bony tissue with small air cells corresponding probably to a natural bony loss in the diploë and to vascular spaces. An estimated endocranial volume of 1498.53 cc was calculated. The convolutional details of the third inferior frontal gyrus (Broca’s caps) are indistinguishable from those found in modern Homo sapiens, and the left occipital lobe appears wider than the right, a possible correlate of right-handedness. Our metric analysis of endocranial measurements also aligns Cioclovina with modern humans. Anat Rec, C 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc. 294:1083–1092, 2011. V Grant sponsors: Marie Curie Research Training Network; Grant number: MRTN-CT-019564; Institute for Aegean Prehistory; Max Planck Society. *Correspondence to: Dr. Katerina Harvati, Paleoanthropology, Department of Early Prehistory and Quaternary Ecology and Senckenberg Center for Human Evolution and Paleoecology, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Rümelinstrasse 23, Tübingen 72070, Germany. Fax: þ49-07071-29-5717. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org C 2011 WILEY-LISS, INC. V Received 21 June 2010; Accepted 25 March 2011 DOI 10.1002/ar.21420 Published online 1 June 2011 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com). 1084 KRANIOTI ET AL. Key words: endocast; virtual reconstruction; modern human origins Cioclovina is one of the earliest reliably dated modern human fossils found in Europe. It was discovered in 1941, during phosphate mining of the Pes tera Cioclovina cave, South Transylvania (Harvati et al., 2007) and constitutes a well-preserved calvarium (Fig. 1). The specimen is dated by recent direct AMS 14C to an age of 29,000þ–700 ka (Olariu et al., 2003) and 28,510þ–170 (ultraﬁltration pretreatment; Soﬁcaru et al., 2007) and assigned to the Aurignacian (e.g., Churchill and Smith, 2000). It preserves the cranial vault and much of its cranial base, while the face is almost entirely absent: only the frontal aspect of the orbits and the upper part of the nasal bones are preserved. The cranium is in good condition and appears to have suffered minimal postmortem distortion. The initial description by Rainer and Simionescu (1942) considered this specimen as a young female. Later studies (Smith, 1984; Harvati et al., 2007; Soﬁcaru et al., 2007) are divided on this point. The overall morphology of the cranium is unquestionably modern human (Rainer and Simionescu, 1942; Necrasov and Cristescu, 1965; Harvati et al., 2007). Some authors have suggested the possibility of partial Neanderthal ancestry for Cioclovina based on their interpretation of the nuchal region (Soﬁcaru et al., 2007; Trinkaus, 2007). According to this view, Cioclovina possesses a suprainiac fossa reminiscent of, though not exactly the same as, the Neanderthal condition often cited as a Neanderthal autapomorphic feature (e.g., Santa Luca, 1978). This interpretation has been disputed. Harvati et al. (2007) applied several criteria developed from the literature to recognize hybrids in the fossil record, including heterosis/dysgenesis, supernumerary teeth and extra sutures, and intermediate shape. None of these criteria suggested that Cioclovina might represent a hybrid. Harvati et al. (2007) further consider the suprainiac morphology of the specimen to lie within the normal range of modern human variation in this anatomical region. Here, we describe the endocranium of the Cioclovina specimen, including the endocast, frontal sinus morphology, as well as the middle meningeal vessel and occipital venous sinus imprints. Where possible, we identify gyri and sulci, particularly on the prefrontal lobe. Some of these traits have been shown to differ between modern and fossil humans. We evaluate these anatomical features with special reference to Neanderthal and modern human endocranial morphology. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study was conducted on a computed tomography (CT) scan of the original Cioclovina calvaria. Scanning was performed using a Siemens sensation 64 medical CT scanner in the facilities of the Centrul De Sanatate ProLife SRL, Bucharest. The scanning direction was coronal (transverse). Slice thickness of 0.625 mm, X-ray tube voltage 120 kV and tube current 304 mA were used. All slices were formatted in the same size of 512 512 pix- els. The reconstruction diameter and pixel resolution were 223 and 0.44 mm. The half-maximum height protocol (Spoor et al., 1993) was used to reconstruct each cranial surface from the CT scan via the software package Amira (Mercury Computer Systems, Chelmsford, MA). To obtain an approximation of the total endocranial volume, missing parts of the cranial base were virtually reconstructed by using a modern human cranium as reference. We determined the reference by carrying out a generalized Procrustes analysis (GPA) and a subsequent principal components analysis (PCA) in form space (Mitteroecker et al., 2004) on 34 anatomical landmarks present in 25 modern human crania and Cioclovina and chose the specimen that was closest to the Upper Paleolithic calvarium in terms of Procrustes distance (Bookstein, 1991). The specimen closest to Cioclovina was a 20-year-old female of Southern African origin (VA24) with an endocranial volume of 1365.43 cc. The missing area incorporates the medial part of the left cerebral fossa, the clivus, the anterior and posterior clinoid processes, parts of the dorsum sellae, the ala minor, the lamina cribrosa, and the posterior part of the orbital roof formed by the frontal bone. Using the opensource software Edgewarp3D (Bookstein and Green, 2002) and AMIRA 5.3, a three-dimensional (3D)-template of 508 anatomical landmarks (n ¼ 34) and semilandmarks (n ¼ 474) was created to capture the geometry of the complete endocranial surface of the reference. We estimate missing data using thin plate splines (TPS; Bookstein, 1991) by warping the complete reference cranium onto the target; in this case, the cranial remains of Cioclovina. This procedure aligns the reference and the target according to homologous anatomical landmarks present in both models. First, a TPS interpolation based on the anatomical landmarks was computed to warp all semilandmarks from the reference to Cioclovina. In this way, the reference and target are aligned according to the anatomical landmarks; and all semilandmarks are roughly estimated according to minimum bending energy of just the landmarks. In a following step, each semilandmark is projected onto the preserved parts of the respective endocranial surface of Cioclovina and slid along tangents to the surfaces. Landmarks on the reference that correspond to the missing area in Cioclovina were manually declared as ‘‘fully relaxed,’’ that is, missing, and are estimated according to the TPS algorithm. Finally, the estimated subcranial parts that are corresponding to the missing area in Cioclovina were fused with the original virtual endocast. The virtual reconstruction (Fig. 2) was used for the quantiﬁcation of the total endocranial volume and for visually assessing the morphological features of the endocranium. The analysis, segmentation, and measurements were performed using Amira 5.3. Cioclovina’s virtual endocast was aligned in dorsal view, and markers were placed on the left (FR-L) and right frontal pole (FR-R) and the left (OC-L) and right CIOCLOVINA ENDOCRANIAL MORPHOLOGY 1085 Fig. 1. Top: Map of Romania showing the approximate location of the Cioclovina cave. Bottom: the Cioclovina cranium in lateral view. occipital pole (OC-R). In the right lateral view, the markers were placed on the vertex (V) and most caudal cerebellar pole (CP). These placements were checked with dorsal and posterior views. The endocast was then rotated to occipital view, and markers were added at the most projecting points laterally on both hemispheres of the cerebrum and at the most laterally projecting points of the cerebellum (at the outside edges of the sigmoid sinuses, if visible) and to the most laterally projected points of the endocast. Additional markers for lambda and bregma were placed with the endocast positioned in occipital and dorsal view, respectively. A series of 1086 KRANIOTI ET AL. Fig. 2. Virtual reconstruction of Cioclovina endocast: (A) frontal, (B) occipital, (C) right lateral, and (D) left lateral view. distances and arcs were then calculated using Amira 5.3 and Rapidform XOR (Inus Technology). Breadth measurements were taken from the dural sinus imprints at the following anatomical regions: superior sagittal sinus (SSS-B) transition curve between superior sagittal sinus and transverse sinus, right transverse sinus, and left transverse sinus (Rosas et al., 2008a). Each measurement was repeated three times by EFK, and the mean value is reported in the Results section (see below, Venus sinus imprints). Several linear measurements were also taken on the endocast following Holloway et al. (2004b) and summarized in Table 1. Fifteen of these were used in a PCA for a dataset including modern humans and fossil hominins, collected by one of the authors (RH). The specimens included are listed in Table 2, and the measurements included in the PCA are listed Table 3. The raw measurements were corrected for size, so that shape would be analyzed, by subtracting the log geometric mean of all measurements for each individual from each log-transformed measurement (thus, generating Mossiman shape variables; Darroch and Mosimann, 1985). We also performed the size correction using the logged endocranial volume instead of the logged geometric mean, with very similar results (not reported). Finally, we performed a discriminant analysis treating the Cioclovina endocast as unknown to be classiﬁed into one of the groups used in the analysis (mod- ern human, Neanderthal, H. erectus [s.l.], Middle Pleistocence African, Middle Pleistocene Europeans, and H. habilis [s.l.]) on the basis of the 15 size-corrected measurements. RESULTS Anatomical Description The virtual reconstruction of Cioclovina calvarium allows the inspection of the endocranial surface and the detailed anatomical description of endocranial features, which are not visible otherwise. The frontal sinus. The human frontal sinuses constitute two irregular air-containing cavities on the frontal bone, each communicating with the middle meatus of the ipsilateral nasal cavity through the fronto-nasal duct (Gray, 1918). The frontal sinus has been considered to be functionally, physiologically, and structurally important (Márquez, 2008), though its precise role is not clear. Our CT imaging revealed a bilateral absence of the frontal sinus in Cioclovina (Fig. 3A,D), in agreement with the observations of Rainer and Simionescu (1942) on a radiograph of the specimen. The frontal sinus region in Cioclovina is occupied by dense bony tissue with small air cells corresponding probably to a natural bony loss in the diploe and to vascular spaces. On the contrary, the 1087 CIOCLOVINA ENDOCRANIAL MORPHOLOGY TABLE 1. Measurements (in mm) on the Cioclovina endocast Deﬁnitions Measurements Total volume Maximum anterio-posterior chord L (mm) Maximum anterio-posterior chord R (mm) Maximum anterio-posterior dorsal arc L (mm) Maximum anterio-posterior dorsal arc R (mm) Maximum anterio-posterior lateral arc L (mm) Maximum anterio-posterior lateral arc R (mm) Maximum breadth chord (mm) Maximum breadth arc (mm) Bregma-lambda cord (mm) Bregma-lambda arc (mm) Bregma-basion chord (mm) Bregma-deepest cerebellum (mm) Bregma-asterion chord L (mm) Bregma-asterion chord R (mm) Bregma-asterion arc L (mm) Bregma-asterion arc R (mm) Bi-asterion breadth (mm) Maximum cerebellar width (with sigmoid sinuses) (mm) Maximum cerebellar width (without sigmoid sinuses) (mm) Depth from vertex to lowest temporal poles (mm) The distance of the Broca’s cap from the midsagittal plane left (mm) The distance of the Broca’s cap from the midsagittal plane right (mm) Maximum width across Broca’s caps (mm) Length from frontal pole L to most posteriorly projecting part of cerebellum (usually just under lat. sinus) (mm) Length from frontal pole R to most posteriorly projecting part of cerebellum (usually just under lat. sinus) (mm) 1498.53 cc 175.60 175.90 261.59 259.03 250.32 247.71 132.11 209.75 109.11 125.34 136.59 114.20 124.80 129.16 159.90 161.70 105.30 114.10 108.17 114.20 51.58 51.18 102.76 166.34 TABLE 2. Samples used in the principal components analysis H.habilis (s.l.): KNM 1470, KNM 1813, KNM 1805 H. erectus (s.l.): Daka, KNM 3883, KNM 3733, Trinil, Sangiran 2, 4, 12, and 17, Sambungmacan 3, Solo XI, Sin LE, SN IID, SinIIL, Hexian H. neanderthalensis: Amud 1, La Chapelle, Spy 1 and 2, Quina 5 Middle Pleistocene Africans and Europeans: Arago XX1, Kabwe, Irhoud 1, Sale H. sapiens 165.16 TABLE 3. Eigenvectors of the ﬁrst two principal components 3 14 9 4 75 frontal sinus on a modern comparative specimen (Fig. 3B,E) constitutes a well-deﬁned asymmetric cavity extending up to high on the frontal squama. Krapina 3 (Fig. 3C,F) exhibits well-deﬁned frontal sinuses which, however, are mostly extended in the area of the supraorbital torus, as seems to be typical for Neanderthals (Kindler, 1960). The imprints of the middle meningeal vessels. The endocranial surface of the neurocranium in the frontal and parietal regions is marked by imprints of the middle meningeal vascular network. To avoid any unnecessary confusion concerning the exact nature of the imprints observed on the endocranium, we use the term middle meningeal vessels, following Bruner and Manzi (2008). We scored the middle meningeal system for the derivation of the middle ramus from the anterior (Adachi’s I), the posterior (Adachi’s II), or both the main branches (Adachi’s III; Bruner et al., 2005; Bruner and Manzi, 2008). In Cioclovina, the middle ramus on the Prin1 Maximum width across Broca’s caps Frontal pole to most posteriorly projecting part of cerebellum Maximum anterio-posterior chord Maximum anterio-posterior dorsal arc Maximum anterio-posterior lateral arc Maximum breadth chord Maximum breadth arc Bregma-asterion chord Bregma-asterion arc Bregma-deepest cerebellum Depth from vertex to lowest temporal poles Bregma-lambda chord Bregma-lambda arc Bi-asterion breadth Maximum cerebellar width (without sigmoid sinuses) Prin2 0.183281 0.097837 0.097836 0.308095 0.140744 0.073028 0.350949 0.043376 0.177397 0.248980 0.291845 0.009515 0.001601 0.095816 0.094174 0.095196 0.061169 0.715061 0.105528 0.172179 0.165442 0.227054 0.470201 0.232406 0.637195 0.114941 0.287161 0.080157 0.279784 0.007707 Bilateral measurements are from the right hemisphere. left part of the cranium seems to have been formed from branches of both the anterior and posterior middle meningeal arteries. However, on the right side, the middle branch of the meningeal artery appears to have derived from the anterior branch alone (Fig. 4). Venus sinus imprints. The anatomical details of the occipital region and the occipital venous sinus 1088 KRANIOTI ET AL. Fig. 3. Cioclovina (A, D), a female modern Greek cranium (B, E) and the Neanderthal Krapina 3 calvaria (C, F) in frontal, superior and lateral view. The Krapina 3 specimen was CT scanned during the European project ‘‘The Neanderthal Tools’’ (Macchiarelli et al., 2005; Macchiarelli and Weniger, 2006) and was obtained from the NESPOS database (htpps://www.nespos.org). The modern specimen belongs to an adult female from a modern osteological collection in Crete, Greece (Kranioti et al., 2008). imprints can be clearly observed on the endocranium of Cioclovina (Fig. 4). At the midsagittal plane, a marked crest (corresponding to the attachment impression of the falx cerebri) is visible. It crosses the internal occipital protuberance through which it is connected with the internal occipital crest (the insertion of falx cerebelli). The left cerebral fossa is deeper (more posteriorly protruding) than the right one, and the latter is crossed by the right sagittal sinus groove. A deep groove representing the SSS is observed at the superior region of the occipital squama. It becomes less marked laterally and at a distance of about 37 mm from the internal occipital protuberance deviates to the right to form the right transverse sinus. The left transverse sinus is obvious from roughly the midsagittal plane and forms a distinctive left transverse sinus. The measurements of the breadths on the sinus imprints were taken where possible. The middle portion of the superior sagittal groove was not visible in the virtual reconstruction; therefore, this measurement was not taken. The breadth on the transition curve between the sagittal and the right transverse sinus groove was about 12.4 mm. The breadths of the right and left transverse sinus grooves were 10.5 and 5.6 mm, respectively. These values are within the normal ranges in modern humans and human fossils (Rosas et al., 2008b). There is an obvious right predominance of the posterior drainage system in Cioclovina. CIOCLOVINA ENDOCRANIAL MORPHOLOGY 1089 such asymmetries. Cioclovina exhibits a protrusion of the right occipital lobe over the left, which is mainly attributed to the right sinus conﬁguration creating the impression of a right occipital petalia (Fig. 4). When the sinus volume is accounted for, the left occipital lobe exceeds the right one in depth and volume, suggesting right handedness. However, a small anterior extension of the left frontal lobe over the right one is also observed. Further features such as gyral and sulcal impressions are clearly visible on the Cioclovina endocast particularly on the third inferior frontal convolution, indicating a truly modern morphology, although deﬁnite parcellation into pars opercularis, triangularis, and orbitalis is difﬁcult (Fig. 5). The occipital (Fig. 6) and parietal regions do show some convolutional relief, but it is very difﬁcult to be certain whether a fragment of the inferior occipital or lunate sulcus is apparent on the left side. There is clearly no evidence for an anteriorly located lunate sulcus, and this region appears fully modern. On the temporal lobe of the right side, a middle temporal sulcus is apparent, dividing superior and inferior temporal gyri. The estimation of the total endocranial volume for the Cioclovina endocast was based on a virtual reconstruction using a modern human cranium as reference. The missing part of the basicranium was reconstructed using TPS, obtaining a total volume of the Cioclovina of approximately 1498.53 cc. Fig. 4. Virtual approximation of the middle meningeal vascular network and the venous sinuses drainage system in Cioclovina. (A) Left side and (B) right side. Endocast A cranial endocast is a 3D replica of the endocranial cavity of the skull. Cranial endocasts allow the observation of some of the external features of the brain. The information on circulatory and nervous system of the endocranium as well as general shapes and volumes can be inferred from endocasts, and such information has been used to address the paleoneurology of fossil hominins (Connolly, 1950; Holloway, 1974; Holloway, 1983; Holloway and Kimbel, 1986; Bruner et al., 2003; Holloway et al., 2004a; Falk et al., 2005; Bruner and Manzi, 2008). Among the most commonly described features of the brain hemispheres are the petalia asymmetries (protrusions of the hemispheres producing imprints on the inner skull surface); the Yakovlenian torque (a forward ‘‘torquing’’ of the structures surrounding the right Sylvian ﬁssure relative to their counterparts on the left); and the asymmetry on the occipital horns of the lateral ventricles (a deeper projection on the left occipital bone is common; Toga and Thompson, 2003). The inferior aspect of the Cioclovina endocast allows the observation of Morphometric analyses. The ﬁrsr two axes of the PCA account for 56.3% of the total variance. PC1 (35.7%) roughly separates modern humans and H. erectus (s.l.) specimens, although there is overlap. Neanderthals, Middle Paleolithic specimens, and H. habilis fall in between. PC2 (20.6%) reﬂects variation within the modern human sample (Fig. 7). Neanderthals are intermediate in their position between the Homo erectus and the modern human sample on PC1. Cioclovina falls within the modern human range along both axes. Although it is meaningless to calculate 95% conﬁdence ellipses for the very small Neanderthal sample, it is worth mentioning that Cioclovina falls outside the Neanderthal range (Fig. 7). Table 3 lists the eigenvectors of the ﬁrst two principal components. PC1 is inﬂuenced mainly by the bregmalambda chord and arc measurements (loading negatively) and to a lesser extent by the maximum breadth chord, the bi-asterion breadth and the maximum cerebellar width (all loading positively). The H. erectus specimens are, therefore, characterized by endocasts with shorter bregma-asteriod chors and arcs, as well as greater maximum breadth chords, bi-asterion breadths, and maximum cerebellar widths, compared to modern human endocasts (although overlap exists in these shapes). PC2 reﬂects mainly differences in the maximum breadth arc (loading negatively), and to a lesser extent, in the maximum anterio-posterior chord and the length from frontal pole to most posteriorly projecting part of the cerebellum (both loading positively). Specimens with more negative PC2 scores, therefore, are characterized by greater maximum breadth arcs and smaller anterioposterior lengths relative to specimens with more 1090 KRANIOTI ET AL. Fig. 5. Convolutional details in Cioclovina’s left endocranial surface lateral view. 1. Superior temporal gyrus, 2. superior temporal sulcus, 3. middle temporal gyrus, 4. Sylvian ﬁssure, 5. crista galli, 6. pars triangularis, 7. pars opercularis, 8. ascending or vertical ramus of Sylvian or lateral ﬁssure, 9. pars orbitalis, 10. superior frontal sulcus, 11. middle frontal sulcus, 12. inferior frontal gyrus, 13. precentral sulcus, 14. precentral gyrus, 15. horizontal ramus of the Sylvian or lateral ﬁssure, 16. superior frontal gyrus, 17. supramarginal gyrus, and 18. inferior portion of superior longitudinal sinus crossing right occipital pole then becoming right lateral sinus. positivie PC2 scores (which include the fossils in this analysis). The discriminant analysis classiﬁed Cioclovina as a modern human with posterior probability of 0.59 (the next highest probability was for H. erectus at 0.18 and for African Middle Pleistocene hominins at 0.16). Crossvalidation classiﬁcation showed that 92% of modern humans were classiﬁed correctly (one misclassiﬁed as H. habilis, one as Middle Pleistocene African, and four as Neanderthals); 60% of Neanderthals were correctly placed (with the remaining two specimens classiﬁed as Middle Pleistocene Africans); 71.4% of H. erectus was correctly classiﬁed (with one specimen classiﬁed as H. habilis, one as Middle Pleistocene African, 1 as Neanderthal and 1 as H. sapiens). DISCUSSION The frontal sinus morphology has been widely discussed in a phylogenetic context and emphasis has been given to its implication in anatomical function and climatic adaptation (e.g., Márquez, 2008). However, the difﬁculties in ascertaining their homology in fossils impede the understanding of their phylogenetic signiﬁcance. Furthermore, among modern humans, the degree of anatomical variability reported for several temporally and spatially distinct populations (Buckland-Wright, 1970; Kupczik, 1999; O’Higgins et al., 2006) is so high that the anatomy of the frontal sinus is considered a unique cranial feature extensively used in forensic identiﬁcation (Quatrehomme et al., 1996; Christensen, 2004; Cox et al., 2009). Frontal sinus agenesis in Cioclovina as extrapolated by the CT reconstruction conﬁrms the observation of Rainer and Simionescu, (1942) inferred by means of radiography. This condition is rare in some populations of modern humans, Fig. 6. Convolutional details in Cioclovina’s endocranial surface occipital view. 1. Inferior occipital sulcus, 2. retrocalcarine sulcus, 3. tempero-occipital incisure, 4. Left lateral sinus, 5. conﬂuence of sinuses, 6. Inferior portion of superior longitudinal sinus crossing right occipital pole then becoming right lateral sinus, 7. left occipital pole, and 8. post-parietal groove. but frequent in others, and is generally not observed in Neanderthals. The absence of the frontal sinus has been reported at a frequency of 95% in a Mesolithic population from Sudan (Greene and Scott, 1973), but 5% in Australians of European extraction (Schuller, 1943), while in sample of Pleistocene–Early Holocene fossils from Tanzania, two of ﬁve specimens exhibited extremely small frontal sinuses (Mumba VI, Strauss III; Kupczik, 1999). The high variability in modern human frontal sinus conﬁgurations has been attributed, among other factors, to the extent of distribution of masticatory stresses on the face (Greene and Scott, 1973). Neanderthals on the other hand appear heavily pneumatized, although pneumatization appears to be mainly constrained to the supraorbital torus region (Fig. 1; Kindler, 1960). The middle medial meningeal system is thought to have undergone marked changes during human evolution (Grimaud-Hervé, 2004), possibly due to its major role in metabolism and thermoregulation (Bruner and Manzi, 2008). In modern humans, the anterior and middle rami are usually predominant compared to the less developed posterior branch, although this pattern is variable (Grimaud-Herve, 2004). The anterior ramus is found to be more (e.g., Gibraltar 1 and 2) or equally (e.g., Le Moustier) predominant to the posterior ramus in Neanderthals and Pre-Neanderthals (Grimaud-Herve, 2004). In Cioclovina, there is a bilateral asymmetry in the pattern of the middle meningeal vessels. On the left side anterior and posterior rami seem to be equally dominant both giving rise to the middle ramus. However, on the right side, the anterior branch is more predominant and gives rise to the middle ramus, with which it shares a large number of anastomoses. While the former pattern characterizes modern humans, the latter is observed in both modern humans and Neanderthals. CIOCLOVINA ENDOCRANIAL MORPHOLOGY 1091 Fig. 7. Principal components analysis PC1 and PC2. A convex hull is drawn for the Neanderthal sample (red polygon). A recent comparative study of venous sinus topology in human fossils did not ﬁnd a straightforward relationship between the venous sinus shape and brain size in Neanderthals and modern humans (Rosas et al., 2008b). Cioclovina exhibits a clear right predominance of the posterior drainage system, with breadth values that fall within the normal range of both modern and other Pleistocene fossil humans (Rosas et al., 2008b). Hemispheric asymmetries are commonly thought to reﬂect hemispheric dominance and handedness in modern humans. In Cioclovina, the right occipital lobe gives an impression of a posterior protrusion, but careful observation reveals that this protrusion results from the conﬁguration of the right venous sinus. The left occipital lobe is larger than the right one in both width and total volume, suggesting right handedness. The slight anterior projection of the left frontal lobe is of minor importance, as the distance of the Broca’s cap from the midsaggital plane is almost equal in both sides of the endocast (see Table 1). Therefore, we suggest that left hemispheric dominance and right handedness is the most likely interpretation. The Cioclovina endocranial volume is well within the range of modern humans, and falls near the average value reported for modern people. Finally, a PCA analysis of 15 size-corrected measurements again places the shape of the Cioclovina endocast with that of modern humans. It is further classiﬁed as a modern human based on a discriminant analysis of the same size corrected measurements. modern human pattern in this Upper Paleolithic European individual. The specimen displays some idiosyncratic features, such as frontal sinus agenesis and rightleft asymmetry in the middle meningeal vessel pattern. However, as far as can be determined, its gyral and sulcal conﬁguration is modern human-like, its estimated endocranial volume falls well within the modern human range of variation, and its endocranial shape places it with modern humans rather than fossil hominins, including Neanderthals. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The CT scan of the modern Greek used in Fig. 1B,D was obtained through funding from the Institute for Aegean Prehistory. Concerning the modern human reference sample, the authors thank Antonio Rosas González (Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid, Spain) and G. W. Weber (Department of Anthropology, Vienna, Austria) for access to CT–data. The ‘‘NESPOS Database  Neanderthal Studies Professional Online Service (http://www.nespos.org) was used to produce Fig. 1C,F. E.F. KRANIOTI thanks Antonio Garcı́a Tabernero for his most valuable advice on 3D virtual tools. Special thanks to David Ramon for his contribution in preparing the 3D virtual approximation of the middle meningeal vascular network and the venous sinuses drainage system, illustrated in Fig. 2A,B. CONCLUSIONS LITERATURE CITED Our examination and description of the Cioclovina endocast and endocranial morphology show a clearly Bookstein F. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1092 KRANIOTI ET AL. Bookstein FL, Green WK. 2002. Edgewarp 3D Available at: ftp:// brainmap.stat.washington.edu/pub/fred/ewsh3.19.man/. Bruner E, Mantini S, Perna A, Maffei C, Manzi G. 2005. Shape analysis of the middle meningeal vessels in Homo erectus, Neandertals, and modern humans. Eur J Morphol 42:217–224. Bruner E, Manzi G. 2008. Paleoneurology of an "early" Neandertal: endocranial size, shape, and features of Saccopastore 1. J Hum Evol 54:729–742. Bruner E, Manzi G, Arsuaga J-L. 2003. Encephalization and allometric trajectories in the genus Homo. Evidence from the Neandertal and modern lineages. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:15335–15340. Buckland-Wright JC. 1970. A radiographic examination of frontal sinuses in early British Populations. Man (NS) 5:512–517. Christensen AM. 2004. The impact of Daubert: implications for testimony and research in forensic anthropology (and the use of frontal sinuses in personal identiﬁcation). J Forensic Sci 49:427–430. Connolly JC. 1950. External morphology of the primate brain. Springﬁeld, Illinois Charles C. Thomas. Cox M, Malcolm M, Fairgrieve SI. 2009. A new digital method for the objective comparison of frontal sinuses for identiﬁcation. J Forensic Sci 54:761–772. Darroch JN, Mosimann JE. 1985. Canonical and principal components of shape. Biometrika 72:241–252. Falk D, Hildebolt C, Smith K, Morwood MJ, Sutikna T, Brown P, Jatmiko, Saptomo EW, Brunsden B, Prior F. 2005. The brain of LB1, Homo ﬂoresiensis. Science 308:242–245. Gray H. 1918. Anatomy of the human body. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger. Greene DL, Scott L. 1973. Congenital frontal sinus absence in the Wadi Halfa Mesolithic population. Man 8:471–474. Grimaud-Herve D. 2004. Endocranial vasculature. In: Schwartz JH, Tattersall I, editors. The human fossil record: brain endocasts. The paleuneurological evidence. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley. p 273–277. Harvati K, Gunz P, Grigorescu D. 2007. Cioclovina (Romania): afﬁnities of an early modern European. J Hum Evol 53:732–746. Holloway RL. 1974. The casts of fossil hominid brains. Sci Am 231:106–115. Holloway RL. 1983. Cerebral brain endocast pattern of Australopithecus afarensis hominid. Nature 303:420–422. Holloway R, Broadﬁeld DC, Yuan MS. 2004a. Brain endocasts—the paleoneurological evidence. New Jersey: Wiley. Holloway RL, Broadﬁeld DC, Yuan MS. 2004b. Methods and materials of endocast analysis. In: Schwartz JH, Tattersall I, editors. The human fossil record brain endocasts, the paleoneurological evidence. New Jersey: Wiley. p 29–35. Holloway RL, Kimbel WH. 1986. Endocast morphology of Hadar hominid AL 162–28. Nature 321:536. Kindler W. 1960. Roentgenologische Studien ueber Stirnhoehlen und Warzenfortsaetze beim klassischen Neandertaler im mitteleuropaeischen Raum. Z Laryng Rhin Otol 39:411–424. _ can MY, Michalodimitrakis M. 2008. Craniometric Kranioti EF, Is analysis of the modern Cretan population. Forensic Sci Int 180:110.e111–110.e115. Kupczik K. 1999. Zur Darstellung und Analyse endo- und intracranialer Merkmale mittels CT-basierender 3DRekonstruktion: Eine Studie an spätpleistozänen und frühholozänen Schädelfunden aus Tansania. Hamburg: Universität Hamburg. Macchiarelli R, Radovčić JPS, Weniger GC. 2005. A ‘‘virtual reality’’ for the Neanderthal fossil record: ‘‘The Neanderthal Tools’’ project. Bull Mém Soc Anthropol Paris 17:14. Macchiarelli R, Weniger GC. 2006. NESPOS: from data accumulation to data management. In: 150 years of Neanderthals discoveries, continuity and discontinuity. Bonn, Germany. p 83–84. Macrini TE, Rowe T, Archer M. 2006. Description of a cranial endocast from a fossil platypus, Obdurodon dicksoni (Monotremata, Ornithorhynchidae), and the relevance of endocranial characters to monotreme monophyly. J Morphol 267:1000–1015. Márquez S. 2008. The Paranasal Sinuses: the last frontier in craniofacial biology. Anat Rec 291:1343–1574. Mitteroecker P, Gunz P, Bernhard M, Schaefer K, Bookstein FL. 2004. Comparison of cranial ontogenetic trajectories among great apes and humans. J Hum Evol 46:679–698. Necrasov O, Cristescu M. 1965. Données anthropologiques sur les populations de l’age de la pierre en Roumanie. Homo 16:129–161. O’Higgins P, Bastir M, Kupczik K. 2006. Shaping the human face. Int Congr Ser 1296:55–73. Olariu A, Skog G, Hellborg R, Stenström K, Faarinen M, Persson P, Alexandrescu E. 2003. Dating of two Paleolithic human fossil bones from Romania by accelerator mass spectrometry. arXiv: physics/0309110v1. Quatrehomme G, Fronty P, Sapanet M, Grévin G, Bailet P, Ollier A. 1996. Identiﬁcation by frontal sinus pattern in forensic anthropology. Forensic Sci Int 83:147–153. Rainer F, Simionescu I. 1942. Sur le premier crâne d’homme Paléolithique trouvé en Roumanie. Analele Academiei Romane Memoriile Sect˛iunii Sçtiint˛iﬁce 17. Rosas A, Bastir M, Garcı́a-Tabernero A, de la Rasilla M, Fortea J. 2008a. Comparative morphology and morphometric assessment of the occipitals from the El Sidrón Neanderthals (Asturias, Northern Spain). Am J Phys Anthropol S46:182. Rosas A, Peña A, Garcia-Tabernero A, Bastir M, De la Rasilla M, J F. 2008b. Endocranial occipito-temporal anatomy of the SD-1219 fossil from the El Sidrón Neandertals. Anat Rec 291:502–512. Santa Luca AP. 1978. A re-examination of presumed Neanderthallike fossils. J Hum Evol 7:619–636. Schuller A. 1943. A note on the identiﬁcation of skulls by X-ray pictures of the frontal sinuses. Med J Aust 25:554–556. Smith FH. 1984. Fossil hominids from the upper Pleistocene of Central Europe and the origin of modern Europeans. In: Smith FH, Spencer F, editors. The origins of modern humans: A world survey of the fossil evidence. New York: Liss. Soﬁcaru A, Petrea C, Dobos A, Trinkaus E. 2007. The human cranium from the Pes tera Cioclovina Uscatǎ, Romania: context, age, taphonomy, morphology, and paleopathology. Curr Anthropol 48:611–619. Spoor F, Zonneveld F, Macho GA. 1993. Linear measurements of cortical bone and dental enamel by computed tomography: applications and problems. Am J Phys Anthropol 91: 469–484. Toga AW, Thompson PM. 2003. Mapping brain asymmetry. Nat Rev Neurosci 4:37–48. Trinkaus E. 2007. European early modern humans and the fate of the Neandertals. Natl Acad Sci USA 104:7367–7372.