Underdeveloped Extraocular Muscles in the Naked Mole-Rat (Heterocephalus glaber).код для вставкиСкачать
THE ANATOMICAL RECORD 293:918–923 (2010) Underdeveloped Extraocular Muscles in the Naked Mole-Rat (Heterocephalus glaber) COLLEEN A. MCMULLEN,1* FRANCISCO H. ANDRADE,1 2 AND SAMUEL D. CRISH 1 Departments of Physiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 2 Departments of Ophthalmology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee ABSTRACT The extraocular muscles (EOM), the effector arm of the ocular motor system, have a unique embryological origin and phenotype. The naked mole-rat (NMR) is a subterranean rodent with an underdeveloped visual system. It has not been established if their ocular motor system is also less developed. The NMR is an ideal model to examine the potential codependence of oculomotor and visual system development and evolution. Our goal was to compare the structural features of NMR EOMs to those of the mouse, a similar sized rodent with a fully developed visual system. Perfusion-ﬁxed whole orbits and EOMs were dissected from adult NMR and C57BL mice and examined by light and electron microscopy. NMR orbital anatomy showed smaller EOMs in roughly the same distribution around the eye as in mouse and surrounded by a very small Harderian gland. The NMR EOMs did not appear to have the two-layer ﬁber distribution seen in mouse EOMs; ﬁbers were also signiﬁcantly smaller (112.3 46.2 vs. 550.7 226 sq lm in mouse EOMs, *P < 0.05). Myoﬁbrillar density was less in NMR EOMs, and triad and other membranous structures were rudimentary. Finally, mitochondrial volume density was significantly less in NMR EOMs than in mouse EOM (4.5% 1.9 vs. 21.2% 11.6, respectively, *P < 0.05). These results demonstrate that NMR EOMs are smaller and less organized than those in the mouse. The ‘‘simpler’’ EOM organization and structure in NMR may be explained by the poor visual ability of these rodents, initially demonstrated by their primiC 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. tive visual system. Anat Rec, 293:918–923, 2010. V Key words: extraocular muscle; Heterocephalus glaber; naked mole-rat; mitochondria The naked mole-rat (Heterocephalus glaber) is a subterranean rodent that rarely experiences natural environmental light. Its visual system is underdeveloped, the naked mole-rat retina contains most of the cell types of visually guided mammals but the structural organization is rudimentary (Mills and Catania, 2004). The neural structures, which arbitrate vision are also atrophied (Crish, SD et al., 2006).Why nonvisually guided mammals retain a visual system at all remains uncertain. Potential reasons include that circadian rhythms and other metabolic activities could still rely on subtle environmental visual cues. Light avoidance, without ﬁne visual details, could also form the sensory arm of an escape behavior in the event of a tunnel breech. In any event, it C 2010 WILEY-LISS, INC. V is unclear whether the regression of the visual system is accompanied by a corresponding change in the ocular motor system. Grant sponsor: NEI Francisco H. Andrade; Contract grant number: EY12998. *Correspondence to: Colleen A. MCMullen, Department of Physiology MS508, University of Kentucky, 800 Rose St., Lexington, KY 40536-0298, E-mail: email@example.com Received 18 September 2009; Accepted 7 December 2009 DOI 10.1002/ar.21107 Published online 23 February 2010 in Wiley InterScience (www. interscience.wiley.com). EXTRAOCULAR MUSCLE IMMATURITY IN MOLE-RATS 919 Fig. 1. Representative light micrographs of cross-sections of mouse and naked mole rat orbits (H&E stain). (A) Anatomy of the mouse orbit showing optic nerve (arrowhead), Harderian gland (black arrow), retractor bulbi (RB), superior oblique, o, orbital layer; g, global layer; \, rectus muscle. (B) Mouse orbital layer, global layer, retina, re- tractor bulbi, levator palpebral superioris (lps), and rectus muscles. (C) Naked mole rat orbit showing optic nerve, muscle, Harderian gland. (D) Naked mole rat orbit with optic nerve, EOMs, Harderian gland. (E and F) Naked mole rat retina, EOMs. (scale bars ¼ 100 lm Figures A, 50 lm Figures B–D, and 25 lm Figures E and F). The extraocular muscles (EOMs), responsible for voluntary and reﬂexive movements of the eyes, are arguably the fastest and most active skeletal muscles (Porter et al., 1995). These small muscles express mostly fast myosins, including an ultrafast tissue-speciﬁc isoform, and contain abundant mitochondria and sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) (Mayr, 1971). The visual system is anatomically and functionally immature at birth; key prop- erties, such as binocularity and depth perception develop postnatally during a species-speciﬁc window called the ‘‘critical period’’ (Berardi et al., 2000). Previously, we demonstrated in mice that dark rearing impairs EOM function and the neural mechanisms underlying compensatory eye movements (McMullen et al., 2004). This indicates that visual experience early in life is necessary for the normal development of EOMs (Cheng et al., 2004, 920 McMULLEN ET AL. McMullen et al., 2004). The study of the ocular motor system of a fossorial mammal such as the naked molerat provides the opportunity to assess the role of visual experience on the development of the extraocular muscles and corresponding central motor pathways. Therefore, this project was designed to compare the orbital anatomy and EOM morphology of the naked molerat and the C57BL mouse. MATERIALS AND METHODS Animals This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees at the University of Kentucky and Vanderbilt University. We used six naked mole-rats and 13 C57BL mice for histology and immunocytochemistry. Upon arrival, the mice were kept in microisolator cages with Harlan Teklad rodent food and water provided ad libitum. Naked mole-rats came from a colony maintained at Vanderbilt University. Naked mole-rats were kept in a temperature -controlled room housed in chambers connected with plastic tubing. Histology Before the collection of tissues, C57BL mice and naked-mole rats mice were anesthetized with ketamine hydrochloride/xylazine hydrochloride (100 mg/8 mg per kg body weight injected i.p.) exsanguinated and perfused with physiological saline, followed by 2% paraformaldehyde and 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4. Whole orbits were dissected and embedded in parafﬁn, 10 lm thick sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) to examine morphology. Sections were imaged with a Nikon E600 microscope equipped with a Spot RT Slider camera and Spot RT software (v 4.0). Fiber size was measured using Image J software from NIH (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/). Quantitative analyses were done by personnel blinded to the experimental conditions. Electron Microscopy Mice and naked mole-rats were perfusion-ﬁxed as described earlier. Individual EOMs were dissected and postﬁxed in 1% osmium tetroxide, stained en bloc in uranyl acetate, dehydrated in a methanol series and propylene oxide, and embedded in epoxy resin. Thin (70 nm) sections were examined and photographed with a Philips Tecnai 12 transmission electron microscope (UK Imaging Core). Mitochondria volume density (% of muscle ﬁber volume occupied by mitochondria) was determined from 104 extraocular muscle ﬁbers (sampled from both global and orbital layers) from digital pictures obtained from six naked mole-rats and 43 extraocular ﬁbers obtained from 13 C57BL mice using a standard point-counting method (144-point grid) with systematic sampling (Weibel, 1979). Fig. 2. Naked mole-rat ﬁber size is smaller. Comparison of mouse (A) and naked mole rat (B) EOM ﬁber size (H&E stain) (scale bars ¼ 50 lm). (C) Mean ﬁber size in EOMs from mouse and naked mole rat. *, signiﬁcant at P < 0.05. RESULTS Anatomy Data Analysis All results are presented as the mean SE of n observations. Mitochondrial volume density and ﬁber area were compared with Student’s t-tests. The signiﬁcance level for rejection of the null hypothesis was set at P 0.05 for all comparisons. The orbits of naked mole-rats were analyzed for overall anatomical features. The basic pattern of six EOMs; superior, lateral, medial, and inferior rectus muscles; superior and inferior oblique muscles (Fig. 1a) are shared among all vertebrate classes (Porter et al., 2003). There are, of course a few difference, for example, in EXTRAOCULAR MUSCLE IMMATURITY IN MOLE-RATS 921 Fig. 3. EOMs of naked mole-rats are not as compact as mouse EOMs. Representative electron micrographs of EOM ﬁbers from mouse (left) and naked mole rat (right). Ultrastructure proﬁles of mitochondria (m), sarcoplasmic reticulum (sr), myoﬁbrillar organization in the A-band (A) and arrows denote large spaces. Scale bars ¼ 2 mm for top and middle rows, and 500 nm for bottom row. some rainbow trout, the lateral rectus is oriented vertically instead of horizontally as in other species (Noden and Fraancecis-West, 2006). Also, in marlins, swordﬁsh and billﬁsh, the superior rectus is exaggerated and is used as a heat-generator to warm the brain and eyes above low water temperatures (Fritsches et al., 2005). Naked mole-rats have the same number of EOMs in the same basic arrangement around the optic nerve and globe, such as the superior oblique, retractor bulbi, and rectus muscles as the mouse (Fig. 1a–d). The eye is protected by an oily substance from the Harderian glands that coats the cornea and prevents dryness (Buzzell, 922 McMULLEN ET AL. Fig. 4. EOMs of naked mole-rats contain m-lines. Electron micrograph illustrating arrangement of bands in sarcomere in NMR (A) and mouse (B). Ultrastructure proﬁles of the M-lines, z-lines (z), mitochondria (m), triads (t), and arrows denote large spaces in naked mole-rats. Scale ¼ 500 nm for both images. 1996). The Harderian gland from the naked mole-rat is noticeably smaller compared to mouse (Fig. 1e,f). In most mammals, EOMs exhibit a distinctive layered organization known as the orbital and global layers. These two layers are characterized by their ﬁber content: the orbital layer consists of smaller ﬁbers and is typically c-shaped (Fig. 1b). These two layers maintain rotational stability of the eyes (Demer et al., 2000). The EOMs from naked mole-rats do not have the two-layer distribution of ﬁbers (orbital and global layers) typically seen in mice, cats, dogs, and primates (Fig. 1e). Muscle Fiber Comparisons EOMs in other mammals have smaller ﬁbers with greater mitochondrial content and unique metabolic and ﬁber type compositions which are distinct from typical skeletal muscles (Porter et al., 2001, Cheng et al., 2004, Cheng and Porter 2002). The EOMs from naked molerats were noticeably smaller compared to mouse (Fig. 2a,b). EOM ﬁber size was signiﬁcantly smaller in naked mole-rat than mouse (112.3 46.2 vs. 550.7 226 lm2, respectively) (Fig. 2c). A characteristic feature of EOMs is a small myoﬁbril size compared to other skeletal muscles. Myoﬁbril density was greatly reduced in the EOMs from naked mole rats, leading to more space between myoﬁbrils (Fig. 3,4a). Sarcomeres produce the typical longitudinal binding pattern of striated muscles. They are formed by an ordered arrangement of thick and thin ﬁlaments. M-lines contain proteins that interconnect and stabilize adjacent myosin ﬁlaments. These structures, especially prominent in fast skeletal muscles, are missing in mouse extraocular muscle (Fig. 4b) (Andrade et al., 2003). They are, however, present in naked mole-rat EOMs (Fig. 4a). Triad and other membranous structures were rudimentary in naked mole- rat EOMs (Fig. 4a). Fig. 5. Naked mole-rat EOMs contain less mitochondria. Mitochondrial volume density (% of ﬁber volume occupied by mitochondria) in EOMs from mouse and naked mole rat. *, signiﬁcant at P < 0.05. The EOMs are reported to have one of the highest mitochondrial contents of mammalian skeletal muscles (Mayr, 1971). This high mitochondrial content has been considered to reﬂect the metabolic demands imposed by their fast and constant activity. The mitochondrial volume density of naked mole rat EOMs was signiﬁcantly less than in mouse (4.5 1.9 vs. 21.2 11.6% of total ﬁber volume) (Fig. 5). Mitochondria were also more pleomorphic in the EOM ﬁbers from naked mole rat (Fig. 3, 4a). Naked mole rat mitochondria are more variable in shape than those of the mouse. DISCUSSION Our ﬁndings demonstrate underdeveloped EOMs in the naked mole rat. Although the naked mole-rat EOMs retain a somewhat typical organization, EOMs are EXTRAOCULAR MUSCLE IMMATURITY IN MOLE-RATS remarkably smaller in size and typical sarcomere arrangement is less well deﬁned. Contrary to adult mouse EOMS; m-lines are present in the EOMs of naked mole-rats. M-lines are present in mouse EOMs during myogenesis, but they disappear soon after birth (Porter et al., 2003). It is then possible that NMR EOMs may persist in a state of incomplete development; also m-line repression may be a characteristic of visually-guided rodents. The results are consistent with these muscles being less active and weaker in these nonvisually guided rodents. It has previously been shown that normal development of the mouse and monkey ocular motor system and its muscles requires visual experience during the critical period (McMullen et al., 2004; Cheng et al., 2004). For example, we have shown that abnormal visual experience postbirth renders mouse EOMs weaker and more fatigable (McMullen et al., 2004). While this paradigm is clearly not applicable to NMR, it does serve to illustrate the connection between the visual pathways and the motor systems serving the eyes. In the case of the NMR, vision is basically replaced by somatosensory inputs, and the visual pathways are correspondingly diminished compared to visually-guided mammals (Mills and Catania, 2004; Nikitina, et al., 2004; Hetling et al, 2005). With this in mind, it is not surprising that NMR EOMs appear underdeveloped. Mitochondrial content in muscle is dynamic and reﬂects the functional demands of the ﬁber type (Lyons et al., 2006). Mitochondria content is also a principal determinant of aerobic capacity. Naked mole-rats show reduced mitochondrial volume density compared to mice. Reduced mitochondrial density is indicative of a reduction of energy demand in these muscles. (Moyes, 2003). As mitochondria are the main generators of ATP, it is possible that this reduction of mitochondria represents a conservation of energy from the eyes, which seem to be used only to detect light or to regulate circadian rhythms (Hetling et al., 2005; Nikitina et al., 2004), so that other systems receive this metabolic gain. The reduced mitochondrial volume density also suggests that naked mole-rat EOMs rely on anaerobic (isolated distribution of small mitochondria) metabolism. Mitochondria may also be important in regulating [Ca2þ]i kinetics during the activation of extraocular muscle ﬁbers, inﬂuencing force production and increasing the dynamic response range for this muscle group (Andrade et al., 2005). Reduced mitochondrial content suggests the naked mole-rats move their eyes less than mice; which is consistent with small ﬁber size. These ﬁndings correlate with previously shown ﬁndings of an overall less well-developed central visual system; a reduced lateral geniculate nucleus, superior colliculus and visual cortex (Crish et al., 2006; Catania and Remple, 2002). The lack of architectural specialization and small size of EOMs in naked mole-rats suggests that the development of their ocular motor system parallels the visual system. The naked mole-rat provides a novel model to study the coordinated evolution and development of visual and ocular motor systems. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors wish to thank Denise Hatala and Gayle Joseph for technical assistance. This work was sup- 923 ported by National Health grant EY12998 (to F.H. Andrade). LITERATURE CITED Andrade FH, Merriam AP, Guo W, Cheng G, McMullen CA, Hayess K, van der ven PF, Porter JD. 2003. Paradoxical absence of M lines and downregulation of creatine kinase in mouse extraocular muscle. J Appl Physiol 95:692–699. Andrade FH, McMullen CA, Rumbaut RE. 2005. Mitochondria are fast Ca2þ sinks in rat extraocular muscles: a novel regulatory inﬂuence on contractile function and metabolism. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:4541–4547. Berardi N, Pizzorusso T, Maffei L. 2000. Critical periods during sensory development. Curr Opin Neurobiol 10:138–145. Buzzell GR. 1996. The Harderian gland: perspectives. Microsc Res Tech 34:2–5. Catania KC, Remple MS. 2002. Somatosensory cortex dominated by the representation of teeth in the naked mole-rat brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:5692–5697. Cheng G, Merriam AP, Gong B, Leahy P, Khanna S, Porter JD. 2004. Conserved and muscle group-speciﬁc gene expression patterns shape postnatal development of the novel extraocular muscle phenotype. Physiol Genomics 18:184–195. Cheng G, Porter JD. 2002. Transcriptional proﬁle of rat extraocular muscle by serial analysis of gene expression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:1048–1058. Crish SD, Dengler-Crish CM, Catania KC. 2006. Central visual system of the naked mole-rat (Heterocephalus glaber). Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 288:205–212. Demer JL, Oh SY, Poukens V. 2000. Evidence for active control of rectus extraocular muscle pulleys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:1280–1290. Fritsches KA, Brill RW, Warrant EJ. 2005. Warm eyes provide superior vision in swordﬁshes. Curr Biol 15:55–58. Hetling JR, Baig-Silva MS, Comer CM, Pardue MT, Samaan DY, Qtaishat NM, Pepperberg DR, Park TJ. 2005. Features of visual function in the naked mole-rat. J Comp Physiol 191:317. Lyons CN, Mathieu-Costello O, Moyes CD. 2006. Regulation of skeletal muscle mitochondrial content during aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 61:3–13. McMullen CA, Andrade FH, Stahl JS. 2004. Functional and genomic changes in the mouse ocular motor system in response to light deprivation from birth. J Neurosci 24:161. Mayr R. 1971. Structure and distribution of ﬁbre types in the external eye muscles of the rat. Tissue Cell 3:433–462. Mills SL, Catania KC. 2004. Identiﬁcation of retinal neurons in a regressive rodent eye (the naked mole-rat). Vis Neurosci 21; 107. Moyes CD. 2003. Controlling muscle mitochondria content. J Exp Biol 206:4385–4392. Nikitina NV, Maughan-Brown B, O’Rian MJ, Kidson SH. 2004. Postnatal development of the eye in the naked mole rat (Heterocephalus glaber). Anat Rec 227A:317. Noden DM, Francis-West P. 2006. The differentiation and morphogenesis of craniofacial muscles. Dev Dyn 235:1194– 1218. Porter JD, Andrade FH, Baker RS. 2003. The extraocular muscles. In: Kaufman PL, Alm A, Editors. Adler’s physiology of the eye clinical application. St. Louis, Misssouri: Mosby Inc. p 787–817. Porter JD, Baker RS, Ragusa RJ, Brueckner JK. 1995. Extraocular muscles: basic and clinical aspects of structure and function. Surv Ophthalmol 39:451–484. Porter JD, Khanna S, Kaminski HJ, Rao JS, Merriam AP, Richmonds CR, Leahy P, Li J, Andrade FH. 2001a. Extraocular muscle is deﬁned by a fundamentally distinct gene expression proﬁle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:12062–12067. Porter JD, Merriam AP, Gong B, Kasturi S, Zhou X, Hauser KF, Andrade, FH, Cheng G. 2003. Postnatal suppression of myomesin, muscle creatine kinase and the M-line in rat extraocular muscle. J Exp Biol 206:3101–3112. Weibel ER. 1979. Stereological methods. London: Academic Press.