close

Вход

Забыли?

вход по аккаунту

?

Патент USA US3096186

код для вставки
July 2, 1963
D. R. CRAIG
3,096,176
PHOTOGRAPHIC PRINTING METHOD
Filed March 13, 1957
m!
Kusuaq
Q.SE
mBDt§ mkatwq‘
DW W
m
w
Tm
C R A1
4%
m
BY
ATTORNEY
3,096,176
United States Patent 0 '
Patented July 2, 1963
2
1
gregate brightness of light at the surface equals a second
?xed predetermined value, then exposing a ?lm of photo
sensitive emulsion to the aggregate light at the surface
3,096,176
PHOTOGRAPHIC PRINTING METHOD
Dwin R. Craig, Falls Church, Va., ‘assignor to Lege
tronics, Inca, Alexandria, Va, a corporation ‘of Dela
and developing the ?lm. The ?rst and second ?xed pre
determined values will equal the endpoints of exposure
respectively, of the photosensitive emulsion having a ?xed
Filed Mar. 13, 1957, Ser. No. 645,717
8 Claims. (01.96-27)
predetermined exposure scale and whose exposure time
This invention relates to a photographic method and
particularly to a method of exposing :a photosensitive
emulsion having a ?xed exposure scale in the reproduc
tion of images of varying density scales. Best results are
ments are made and on which the light is projected is
can be constant.
The surface at which the measure
preferably a plane. The light of uniform intensity super
imposed on the image light may be produced by a separate
auxiliary light source, in which case, particularly for color
work, the multiple light sources will possess similar color
achieved in photographic printing when the density scale
characteristics.
of the vnegative exactly matches the exposure scale of the
-A more complete understanding of the invention will
photosensitive surface on which the print is to be made. 15
follow from a ‘description of the accompanying drawings
An assortment of negatives will invariably possess a wide
wherein:
range of density scales, depending not only on the original
FIG. 1 is a schematic view depicting an application of
scene and its illumination, but also on the many parame
the invention; and
ters in the photographic process itself, such as lens ?are,
FIG. 2 is a curve depicting relationships of values
light scatter within the camera, characteristics of the
employed.
?lm, and subsequent processing of the ?lm.
The method of reducing the contrast of a projected
image can best be understood by referring to MG. 1 of
the drawings depicting a source 8 directing light through
niques include the selection of graded contrast photo 25 a condensing lens 10, a negative 12, and a lens 14 towards
In accordance with present practice, there are several
ways in which the photographer can cause his ?nal print
to exhibit an acceptable range of densities. These tech
an easel 16 whose upper surface is adapted to support a
graphic papers to suit the given negative, manipulation
of exposure and development to give the desired con
trast response of the photographic emulsion, and the use
of paper whose variable contrast depends upon the color
photosensitized body of printing material 18. The light
passing through the thinnest portion 20 of the negative
(corresponding to extreme shadow in the original scene)
of the exposing light. Each of these methods requires
30 is received at the easel at ‘an intensity value denoted I1.
that the photographic material on which the print is to
be made he chose-n to match the negative, and in each
case only the density scale can be accurately forecast,
requiring the desired absolute densities to be obtained by
manipulating the time of exposure. With so many vari
ables to be controlled, these techniques possess many
shortcomings which have long been known to those en
gaged in the art.
It is among the objects of the present invention to make
it possible to obtain ‘absolute, end-point, maximum and
minimum print densities and to e?ectively eliminate many
of the variables which must be considered by conven
tional techniques of contrast control. This invention
renders possible the reproduction of all negatives on a
The light passing through the densest portion 22 of the
negative (corresponding to extreme highlight in the origi
nal scene) is projected onto the easel at an intensity value
denoted 12. The contrast of the negative is usually ex
pressed by the ratio 11:12. Since the present invention
single type of printing material, ‘followed by a single
standardized development procedure. Among other ad
vantages, conventional printing materials and processing
techniques may be used.
viewed by the eye or a camera through a haze are re
The ‘functions of both contrast and density control may
be performed exclusively in the exposing operation by ad 50
justing the projected image of the negative to match a
known standard printing material, as distinguished from
the common expedient of selecting or adjusting the print
ing material to accommodate the characteristics of the
negative. The invention contemplates a method for
measuring and properly varying the brightness and con
trast characteristics of the projected image to insure a
match between the image characteristics and those of the
photosensitive surface of the printing material. A rel-a
tively high contrast (short exposure scale) printing mate
rial will be used in order that image contrast can be
optically reduced to match it.
The photographic printing. method contemplated by
.the present invention comprises directing light from ‘a
source to an object and projecting an image of the object
on a surface, measuring the maximum brightness of the
image at the surface, adjusting the overall brightness of
the image until the maximum 'brightness equals a ?rst
?xed predetermined value, superimposing light of uni 70
form intensity ‘over the surface, adjusting the brightness
of the light of uniform intensity until the minimum ag
contemplates that this ratio will always exceed the ex
posure scale of the photosensitive printing material to be
used, in order to effect an exact match, it is necessary to
reduce the value of this [1:12 ratio. This reduction is
achieved by superimposing on the image formed on the
easel, a beam of light of uniform intensity, from the same
light source or from a separate source, which will re
duce the image contrast to which the printing material is
exposed, in a manner similar to that in which images
duced in contrast.
The effect of such superimposed light irom an auxiliary
source 24, which produces a uniform intensity 13 at the
easel, is represented by the equation:
IH
1 2+1 B
where IS is the image intensity which will represent the
shadow area in the ?nal print, and 1;; is the image in
tensity Which will represent the highlight area in the
?nal print. From this equation it will be evident that
the presence of the auxiliary light 13, which does not
pass through the negative, will reduce the contrast in the
printed image below that which would occur without
such light.
'
Through the selected thin and dense portions of th
negative, according to this invention, the sum of the
image forming light and the auxiliary light will be a
constant. Accordingly, the adjusted image intensity repre
senting the shadow area will be expressed by
and the adjusted image intensity representing the high
light area will be expressed by
IH=I2+IB
Then, if T represents a ?xed exposure time, since ex
3,096,176
3
4
posure is expressed as the product of intensity and time,
It is well known that atmospheric haze between a sub-—
ject and a camera will reduce image contrast, and simi
lar effects are produced by light scattering or ?are within
the camera. Under these conditions, contrast of detail
UK ‘will su?er a greater reduction within shadow areas than
Since the value ‘of IST is a constant, it can be expressed
as ‘Ks, and similarly, since the value of IHT is :a constant,
it will within highlight areas. The net eifect is a non
linear reproduction of the original scene due to the addi
it can be expressed as KH. These values denote the end
tion of haze to the positive image. The method of con
trast control described herein reduces contrast of the
points of exposure for the photosensitive printing mate
rial to be used, and indicate in FIG. 2 of the ‘drawing 10 projected image by adding “haze” to the negative image
which is equivalent to subtracting haze from the positive
duce maximum and minimum print densities with printed
image (in terms of the resulting non-linearities in tone re
material having the characteristic curve shown.
production) tending to compensate for the initial haze
Thus it will appear that means must be provided [for
conditions. Accordingly, reproductions made by the pres
varying the brightness of the projected image, and for 15 ent technique will more nearly duplicate the actual scene
varying the brightness of the auxiliary light superimposed
than will conventional printing.
upon the projected image. Brightness of the projected
The present invention is by no means limited to photo
image can be controlled by varying the intensity of the
graphic printing in an enlarger, but is equally applicable
light source by means of a variable resistor 26, for ex
to contact printing, certain types of initial photography,
ample; by varying the size of an aperture 28 in the
and other forms of reproduction; nor is it limited to re
optical path of the image forming light; and/ or by inter
production in black and white since color reproduction
posing one or more ?lters ‘30 in the optical path. Simi
is de?nitely contemplated, and in both cases applies to
larly, the intensity of light coming from the auxiliary
both negative/positive ‘as well as reversal materials. It is
source can be modi?ed by a variable resistor 32, a vari
especially important in color reproduction that light from
the maximum and minimum exposures which will pro
able aperture 34, .and/ or a filter 36. After such ‘appro
25 separate sources have similar color characteristics.
priate means for controlling intensities are incorporated
into the apparatus, it is necessary to select two points
within the projected image which represent the extreme
shadow ‘and the extreme highlight in the original scene,
In
other words, the spectral (distribution of light from said
sources and the spectral sensitivity of said emulsion in
clude common ranges of wavelength.
Color correction
(in making color separations) can be simply introduced
and then measure the light intensity at the easel 16 cor 30 by using different pairs of values for K for the ditferent
responding thereto. The measuring device may be a
colors being recorded. Hence, the single example of the
conventional photometer, such as an electronic photometer,
invention shown ‘and described should not be construed
schematically depicted in FIG. 1 as comprising one or
as limiting the invention beyond the scope of the ap
more photosensitive cells 38 connected in circuit with a
pended claims.
I claim:
meter 40 by means of a switch 42. It is important to 35
note that the brightness measurements are made in the
1. A photographic printing method comprising direct~
same apparatus with which the actual exposure will be
ing light from a source to an object and projetcing an
performed and that the brightness measurements are made
image of said object on a surface, positioning brightness
in the plane to be occupied by the photosensitive emul
indicating devices at points approximating respectively
sion carried by the printing material. The brightness 40 the minimum and the maximum brightness of said image
measurements should be made through ?lters, such as
vat said surface, adjusting the overall brightness of said
?lters 30 land 36, which transmit only that part of the
image until the maximum brightness indicating ‘device
spectrum to which the photographic emulsion carried by
indicates a ?rst ?xed predetermined value, superimposing
the printing material is sensitive.
light of uniform intensity over said surface, adjusting the
Assuming that only one photometer is used, the meas 45 brightness of said light of uniform intensity until the
urement land control procedure might be as follows:
minimum brightness indicating device indicates a second
?xed predetermined value, then exposing ‘a ?lm of photo
sensitive emulsion to the aggregate light at said surface
and developing said ?lm.
(1) Place the photometer in the plane of the projected
image at the point of maximum image brightness; (2)
with IE at zero, adjust the image brightness to the pre
determined value of Ks which can be read directly from 50
2. A photographic method :as set forth in claim 1
a properly calibrated photometer scale; (3) move the
wherein said image brightness ‘and said superimposed uni- ‘
photometer in the plane of the projected image to the
position of minimum brightness where it will be found
that 12 is less than the desired value KH; (4) increase
the intensity of light from the auxiliary source 24 until
the sum of I2 plus IB produces a photometer reading
corresponding to the predetermined value of KH. (Since
it will be found that the addition of IE will contribute
form brightness are adjusted to satisfy simultaneously
the following equation:
and
where
very little to the area of high brightness (11), no re
adjustment of Is will be required); (5) place the print
60
ing material on the easel and expose it for the predeter
mined ?xed time (T).
Thus, by way of summary, according to the present
invention, the method of contrast control requires only
a single photographic material (any standard high con 65
trast emulsion on paper, ?lm, or glass) and involves pro
I1=maxirnum image brightness,
12=minimum image brightness,
IB=brightness of uniformly superimposed light,
T=predeterrnined time of exposure,
Ks=exposure required to produce maximum density of
the exposed and developed emulsion, and
KH=ex~posure required to produce minimum density of
the exposed and developed emulsion.
cedures which can be followed readily by those familiar
with standard developing practice; all measurements are
‘3. A photographic printing method as set forth in claim
made in the plane of the projected image which the emul
1 wherein said ?rst and second ?xed predetermined values
sion to be exposed will ultimately occupy; and a ?xed 70 equal the values of exposure respectively which will pro
exposure time can be used for all negatives with the
duce minimum and maximum density of said photosensi
assurance that maximum and minimum print densities
tive emulsion after developing said ?lm.
will correspond to maximum and minimum negative
4. A photographic printing method as set forth in claim
densities, and that the desired absolute values for maxi
1 wherein said surface is a plane.
mum and minimum print density will be obtained.
5. A photographic printing method ‘as set forth in claim
75
3,096,176
1 wherein said ?lm is exposed to said aggregate light for
a ?xed predetermined time independent of the object. \
References Cited in the ?le of this patent
UNITED STATES PATENTS
6. A photographic printing method as set forth in claim
1,840,351
1 wherein said light of uniform intensity is produced by
2,149,250
Bing ________________ __ Mar. 7, 1939
2,352,914
Rackett _______________ __ July 4, 1944
2,571,597
2,353,921
Evan's --------------- -- Oct- 16, 1951
Biedel‘m'a‘nn et ‘a1 ------ -- Sept 30, 1953
a separate light source.
7. A photographic printing method as set forth in claim
6 wherein the spectmal distribution of light from said
5
sources and the spectral sensitivity of said emulsion inelude common wages of wavelength‘
Douden ______________ __ Ian. 12, 1932
QTHER REFERENCES
Photo rva h
Directo
Zitf-Davis Publ Co-
8. A photographic printing method as set forth in claim 10 York, 19g5 6fjpgtge 122. ry’
1 wherein said object is a transparency and said image
is formed by light tnansmitted through said tnanspareney.
To
. Ph t who a h
Chicargyo', Jul‘; clglsliragpe
.
New
’
ubl Gm hi Art Mon/m1
'
p c
8
y’
Документ
Категория
Без категории
Просмотров
0
Размер файла
452 Кб
Теги
1/--страниц
Пожаловаться на содержимое документа