close

Вход

Забыли?

вход по аккаунту

?

Computational Linguistics Lab: p g p g How to write a paper critique

код для вставки
Computational
p
Linguistics
g
Lab:
How to write a paper critique
Elena Cabrio,
El
C b i FBK-Irst
FBK I
mail: cabrio@fbk.eu
Outline:
`
What makes a good paper?
Whyy are paper
p p critiques
q
important?
p
Stepwise instruction to write a paper critique.
`
Let’s do a critique together!
`
`
`
Guidelines for paper review
13.10.2010 - Computational Linguistics Lab: How to write a paper critique
(2)
What makes a good paper?
(project report
report, thesis)
9 Good papers contain something of merit…
9 … and well presented through a logical structure
Why is the
topic
important?
Don’t
introduce new
material !
(1) Abstract
(2) Introduction
(3) Body of the paper (techniques,
results, discussions)
(4) Conclusions
(5) References
Better present
the experiments,
data.
ata. Bee clear!
c ea !
SUMMARY of the paper:
statement of the original
problem and conclusions
(6) Tables
Detailed DESCRIPTION
of the approach.
ANALYSIS of results, and
discussions of errors
All the previous works
that
h are significant
f
for
f
the topic
(7) Figures
13.10.2010 - Computational Linguistics Lab: How to write a paper critique
(3)
Why are paper critiques important?
FOR THE AUTHOR
IN SCIENTIFIC
CONFERENCES
To receive feedback on:
• the understandability of the topic
as it is expressed
• the value of the work
• possible improvement of the work
• maintain academic integrity
• reward valuable/interesting works
Papers
submission
PEER REVIEW
PROCESS
9
CONFERENCE
?
13.10.2010 - Computational Linguistics Lab: How to write a paper critique
(4)
The importance of highhigh-profile reviewers…
reviewers
13.10.2010 - Computational Linguistics Lab: How to write a paper critique
(5)
Why are paper critiques important?
FOR THE REVIEWER
• To exercise a critical attitude towards
research papers
• To help understanding a difficult topic
• To know about work done by other
people on topics you are interested to
• To get new ideas for possible research
directions, future work
MAKE IT A CONSTRUCTIVE TASK!
13.10.2010 - Computational Linguistics Lab: How to write a paper critique
(6)
Stepwise instructions to write a paper critique:
Read the paper straight
through without marking a
word: pay attention to
the CONTENT
OVERALL CRITIQUE
Look at the CITATIONS
Back to the
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION:
Focus on the problem and
Does her reasons
the writer’s solution
support her thesis?
(THESIS)
Enough evidences?
Read the BODY of the
paper, paragraph by
pparagraph…
g p
Check GRAMMAR and
SPELLING
Read the
CONCLUSIONS.Does they
ti ttogether
ties
th th
the paper or
end weakly?
13.10.2010 - Computational Linguistics Lab: How to write a paper critique
(7)
Let’s
Let s try together!
Aurlien Max, Guillaume Wisniewski, “Mining Naturally occurring
C
Corrections
andd Paraphrases
P
h
from
f
Wikipedia’s
W k d ’ Revision
R
History”
H
”
http://www lrec-conf org/proceedings/lrec2010/pdf/827 Paper pdf
http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2010/pdf/827_Paper.pdf
13.10.2010 - Computational Linguistics Lab: How to write a paper critique
(8)
Guidelines for paper review:
`
Paper description:
`
`
`
`
Why do you like this work?
Why do you dislike this work?
`
`
`
`
`
Summary of the paper
paper, key ideas
What are the main contributions?
Serious technical mistakes
Isn’t novel (provide related work/papers)
Doesn’t demonstrate all its point by proofs, simulations, experiments
Makes unreasonable assumptions
Detailed comments on the paper
`
`
What did you learn reading the paper?
What are the technical things you appreciated?
13.10.2010 - Computational Linguistics Lab: How to write a paper critique
(9)
Guidelines for paper review (cont.):
(cont ):
`
Comments on their references & related work:
`
`
`
How does
H
d
the
th paper relate
l t with
ith others
th
works/projects/papers?
k/ j t/
?
Which of them have been cited and which you know that are related but
have not been references by the authors?
Comment its presentation style:
`
`
`
`
`
`
Does the
D
th paper describe
d
ib clearly
l l its
it goals?
l?
Did the paper deliver what originally promised?
What were the motivations (what issues/problems inspired this
research), assumptions (of the setting, requirements), contributions?
Is the bibliography format/list of keywords complete?
Are the figures readable? Can you see the trend? Do they explain the
trend or “strange behaviour”? Do the results in the figures make sense?
List any writing style remarks/corrections (english grammar, syntax,...)
13.10.2010 - Computational Linguistics Lab: How to write a paper critique
(10)
Guidelines for paper review (cont.):
(cont ):
`
Make concrete suggestions for how to improve the paper
Do you have any unanswered questions on the paper?
`
What would be good follow-on projects and why?
`
13.10.2010 - Computational Linguistics Lab: How to write a paper critique
(11)
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
`
Guidelines for paper review
http://www.ics.forth.gr/mobile/paper_review.html
`
How to review a technical paper
http://eetd.lbl.gov/ea/buildings/alan/publications/how.to.review.html
`
How to critique a Research Paper
http //
http://www.ehow.com/how_4885835_critique-research-paper.html
h
/h
4885835 iti
h p p ht l
`
D.J. Benos, K.L. Kirk, J.E.Hall, How to review a paper
http://advan physiology org/cgi/content/full/27/2/47
http://advan.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/27/2/47
`
J.F. Polak,The role of the manuscript reviewer in the peer review process
http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/165/3/685
`
W.G. Baxt, J.F.Waeckerle, J.A. Berlin, M.L. Callaham.Who reviews the reviewers?
Feasibility of using fictitious manuscript to evaluate peer reviewer performances.
Ann Emerg Med 32:310
32:310,317,
317 1998
1998.
13.10.2010 - Computational Linguistics Lab: How to write a paper critique
(12)
Документ
Категория
Без категории
Просмотров
15
Размер файла
266 Кб
Теги
1/--страниц
Пожаловаться на содержимое документа