close

Вход

Забыли?

вход по аккаунту

?

Quality in switzerland and at UNIL

код для вставкиСкачать
Fitness for Purpose
Why and How to
Evaluate Doctoral programs
A Swiss experience
Jacques
Quality LanarГЁs
Evaluation
Context
Evaluation of Doctoral Programs
• Context and Intentions
• Quality approach
• Evaluation of Programs
Context
Quality
Evaluation
Evaluation of Doctoral Programs
• Context and Intentions
• Quality approach
• Evaluation of Programs
Context
Quality
Evaluation
Inter-university project to
• Improve the training researchers
• Increase cross fertilization
• Help development of doc. prgs
Context
Quality
Evaluation
Framework
• Specifications and Call
• Political and pedagogical
selection
• Financed
• Evaluation required
Context
Quality
Evaluation
Required caracteristics
• Inter-institutional & Interdisciplinary
• Represents a scientific field
• Create a training environment
• Training for research
Context
Quality
Evaluation
Evaluation of Doctoral Programs
• Context and Intentions
• Quality approach
• Evaluation of Programs
Context
Quality
Evaluation
A process to regulate В« tensions В»
Teacher’s
priorities
Expectations
professional
Fields
Student’s
Needs
Context
Quality
Evaluation
A process to regulate В« tensions В»
Investigations
Professional
Bodies
Teacher’s
priorities
Expectations
professional
fields
surveys
Student’s
Needs
investigations
previous students
Context
Quality
Evaluation
Authorities
Teachers
Students
Context
Quality
Evaluation
Authorities
Teachers
Students
Indicators
Context
Quality
Evaluation
Authorities
Peers
Teachers
Students
Context
Quality
Evaluation
Authorities
Surveys
Teachers
Students
Context
Quality
Evaluation
Authorities
Teachers
Students
Context
Quality
Evaluation
Quality Culture
• Fitness for Purpose
• Responsibility
• Participation
• Reflexivity
• Balance between Autonomy and Accountability
Context
Quality
Evaluation
Fitness for Purpose
• Project evaluation grid
• Questions of evaluation
Context
Quality
Evaluation
To try to avoid paternalism
•Self evaluation
•Constructive feedback from colleagues
Context
Quality
Evaluation
To Encourage Participation
• Involvement various “actors”
• Inter-programs meeting
Context
Quality
Evaluation
•
Support reflexivity
with questions of
the canvas / guide
Context
Quality
Evaluation
Evaluation of Doctoral Programs
• Context and Intentions
• Quality approach
• Evaluation of Programs
Context
Quality
Evaluation
Objectives of Evaluation
• Was the program conform to planning
?
• To what extent match students
expectations ?
• Is there an added value perceived ?
• What can we learn ?
Context
Quality
Evaluation
Principles
• Learning organisation logic
• Financing not linked to results
• Involvement of all partners
Context
Quality
Evaluation
Evaluation Process
Working out
•Questionnaires
•Canvas
“Gathering”
Intermediate
Evaluation
Final
Evaluation
•Distribution
•Self-evaluation
•Treatment
•Meeting
share practice
• Final
Questionnaire
•Evaluation by
directors
•Counsellors
global
report
Final
Report
T = 36 months
•Meeting
Material
Results
Global
Vision
T=0
T= 18 months
T = 24 months
Context
Quality
Evaluation
Report
•
•
•
•
•
Goals
Results (part./object./act.)
Organisational context
“side” effects
Global evaluation
Context
Quality
Evaluation
Some results of evaluation
• No accurate indicator of effect
• Progress observed in thesis work
(acceleration)
• Better professional integration
& relations
• Increased ability to argue
Context
Quality
Evaluation
What did we learn ?
• Interest of sharing practices
• Usefulness to support the reflexive
process
• Drive to learn not so strong….
• Evaluation culture has to be developed
Context
Quality
Evaluation
Experience alone does not lead to learning
Context
Quality
Evaluation
What did we learn ?
• Interest of sharing practices
• Usefulness to support the reflexive
process
• Drive to learn not so strong….
• Evaluation culture has to be developed
Context
Quality
Evaluation
What did we learn ?
• Interest of sharing practices
• Usefulness to support the reflexive
process
• Drive to learn not so strong….
• Evaluation culture has to be developed
Context
Quality
Evaluation
Evaluation Process
Working out
•Questionnaires
•Canvas
“Gathering”
Intermediate
Evaluation
Final
Evaluation
•Distribution
•Self-evaluation
•Treatment
•Meeting
share practice
• Final
Questionnaire
•Evaluation by
directors
•Counsellors
global
report
Final
Report
T = 36 months
•Meeting
Material
Results
Global
Vision
T=0
T= 18 months
T = 24 months
Context
Quality
Evaluation
What is important
is not the dancer
It is the dance …
Context
Quality
Evaluation
Документ
Категория
Презентации
Просмотров
4
Размер файла
1 384 Кб
Теги
1/--страниц
Пожаловаться на содержимое документа